Laserfiche WebLink
1. General Fund - Salary raises for employees within General Fund <br />Departments will be implemented within the budgetary allocation made <br />originally by the Commission in adopting the budget for fiscal year <br />88/89. Equitable adjustments combined with a $5,000 salary cap bring <br />total salary increases for the General Fund to $313,170. With benefits <br />added to salaries the total amount required is $391,462. This amount is <br />approximately $10,000 less than the amount budgeted by the Commission <br />for this fiscal year. <br />2. MSTU Fund - Equitable adjustments and implementation of the $5,000 <br />salary cap (except for Community Development Director Keating) have <br />reduced the deficit in the MSTU fund budgeted for salary contingencies <br />from $49,480 to $20,643. At our earlier meeting, discussion indicated <br />that a budget amendment from MSTU Contingencies or from the refund <br />received in the time share lawsuit could be used to cover this $20,643 <br />deficiency. <br />3. Housing Authority & Rental Assistance - The employees within these <br />departments were given a 5% pay raise. It was felt that increases <br />beyond the 5% amount should be initiated by the Housing Authority <br />Board rather than by the County Administrator. <br />4. Road and Bridge Fund - The Board had allocated $200,000 for salary <br />contingency in the 1988-89 budget. At full implementation this would <br />have amounted to a deficit of $64,111. With implementation of the $5,000 <br />salary cap and some equitable adjustments, the deficit has been reduced <br />to $58,650. Recommendations for budget amendments to cover this <br />deficit will be forthcoming from the Director of the Office of Management <br />and Budget. <br />5. Other Departments <br />A. Petition Paving - 27% reduction below full implementation. <br />B. Solid Waste Management - no change. <br />C. Golf Course Operations 11-95 reduction. <br />D. Gifford Sewer - no change <br />E. Building Department - 11% reduction from original proposal. Note - <br />there are severe problems with the salary study as relates to plans <br />examiners and building inspectors, i.e. the salary classification plan <br />would have them making significantly less than they are right now. <br />Our current rates are competitive with surrounding jurisdictions. <br />This situation will be re-evaluated with the Personnel Department <br />and mid -year adjustments may be necessary. Most plans examiners <br />and building officials are receiving a 5% increase at this time. <br />F. Utilities - 12% reduction from original proposal. <br />G. Fleet Management - 15% reduction below original proposal. <br />Summary - The adjustments made to salaries based on considerations of <br />equity, plus the implementation of the $5,000 salary cap had the net effect of <br />trimming 18% off the amount needed for full implementation of the salary <br />survey. In other words, $193,640 (or if fringe benefits are included, <br />$242,050) was trimmed off the "full implementation" proposal for the salary <br />survey. <br />Final implementation of the salary survey will require a total increase in <br />salaries County -wide of $863,121. With fringe benefits added to that amount, <br />the total additional funding for salaries and benefits will come to $1,078,901. <br />Payroll adjustments will be seen in the next paychecks to County employees. <br />Budget amendments as required will be brought before the Board by the <br />County Commission. Since the Commission did make provision for salary <br />contingencies in the fiscal year 88-89 budget, there are no immediate <br />shortfalls and the budget amendments will make any necessary provisions to <br />cover future shortfalls. <br />36 <br />OCT 11 1988 <br />POOF 74 OGE 480 <br />