Laserfiche WebLink
in her mind that eventually 20th Avenue will have to be extended <br />south, but she felt it is a matter of timing. Her recommendation <br />would be that this be referred back to the Committee and they can <br />try to work out various other alternatives. <br />Board members wond6red how it happened that this was brought <br />up at that meeting, and Public Works Director Davis stated that <br />the situation simply is that 20th Avenue has been on our <br />Thoroughfare Plan since the Plan was developed, and it does show <br />a connection into the Highlands. As to the argument that 20th <br />Avenue is a residential street through the Oslo Park area, he <br />pointed out that 20th Avenue is a residential street from 12th <br />St. south to Oslo Road. <br />Chairman Scurlock believed the Board looked at this quite <br />closely and agreed that at least for now, we are not going along <br />with an extension of 20th Avenue further south. <br />Director Davis argued that the prolonging of the timing <br />would be a detriment to accomplishing this and asked if the Board <br />wished the Thoroughfare Plan changed. <br />The Board generally agreed that it is a matter of timing and <br />indicated that they would not go along with this at this time. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Bowman, SECONDED by Com- <br />missioner Eggert, that Board unanimously indicated <br />that it would not approve the recommendation to <br />readdress the extension of 20th Avenue at this time. <br />It was noted that the Board earlier expressed their support <br />of Amendment 4. <br />Re Item 4, Commissioner Bowman advised that this is in the <br />works. Actually, they are grandfathered in. It is a very bad <br />situation with the parking problem, and we are trying to work <br />with the property owner. <br />95 <br />N O V 1 1988 <br />BOOK .75 PAGE 95 <br />