My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/28/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
2/28/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:41:47 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:42:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/28/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FEB 28 1989 <br />BOOK <br />d F'AE5O <br />not subject to the D.R.I. Section, to contribute proportionate <br />share of funds, land, or public facility necessary to accommodate <br />the impact. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt that maybe we will enact such an <br />ordinance before the project is finished. <br />Commissioner Scurlock was also concerned about the amount of <br />water storage capacity required for fire flow. He pointed out <br />that Grand Harbor is committed to providing some storage, and he <br />hoped that this developer would work in conjunction with them to <br />build enough storage for both projects. That is what the <br />Utilities Department prefers rather than any alternatives. <br />Mr. Boling advised that the applicant's attorney, Steve <br />Henderson, has requested in writing an additional sentence to <br />27.a under Fire Protection: At the end of the commitment to the <br />250,000 gatlons or more water storage, add "not withstanding the <br />foregoing, the County Utilities Department may approve other <br />facilities to provide the flow need for fire protection." <br />Utilities Director Terry Pinto is not in favor ofadding this <br />sentence, as he feels it could conflict with the utilities' <br />master plan for this area. Therefore, it is staff's <br />recommendation that the sentence not be added. <br />Attorney Collins pointed out that there is a provision that <br />the local government and the developer can enter into capital <br />contribution funding agreement as part of the D.R.I. Development <br />Order to reimburse the developer or a successor for voluntary <br />contributions paid in excess of his fair share. In other words, <br />if we do not have something in place right now, and they want to <br />front end the cost of getting utilities to their project, there <br />can be agreements that other people would reimburse them as they <br />came on line. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt it is up to them to work on that <br />since their insurance costs are going to be dictated by what kind <br />of fire protection they have. If they do not meet fire flow and <br />30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.