My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/9/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
5/9/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:01:02 PM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:50:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/09/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r . <br />q`Y 9 <br />Boa 76 <br />fence or any of the other improvements are of any interest to us, <br />and felt it would be easier just to establish a small monetary <br />value. Thirdly, he wished to know if there is any <br />requirement to go out publicly to entertain proposals. <br />County Attorney Vitunac confirmed that there is a require- <br />ment when the County leases land to go out to public bid. <br />However, there is only one person making the proposal to us for a <br />100 x 200 piece of land to do certain things, and staff felt the <br />expense and effort of going out to public bid wouldn't be worth <br />it. It was felt this was almost like a sole source provider. In <br />regard to the termination ability, there are no termination <br />provisions earlier than 18 months and -if we cancel, we have to <br />pay for the improvements, but we can adjust that if the Board <br />desires. <br />Utilities Environmental Specialist John Lang explained that <br />the site in question is only half an acre. It contains a shallow <br />well and since we would not be allowed to use it for effluent <br />disposal within a 500' perimeter of that well, the entire chain <br />link enclosure would be exempted. Mr. Lang advised that Ag <br />Evaluations, our major bulk buyer of sod, had requested that the <br />County provide him a security enclosure for his tractor/trailer; <br />however, as the sod farm is a pay-as-you-go operation, he was <br />informed he would have to provide it. He lost his lease on <br />another piece of property where he kept his equipment, and since <br />at the sod farm we have a well that is not functional, no <br />electrical hook-up or phone hook-up, Mr. Lang felt the County <br />could benefit from this arrangement and that Ag Evaluation, our <br />bulk customer, could as well. <br />Commissioner Scurlock pointed out that the well could be <br />closed down and then we could use the property for effluent <br />disposal, and Mr. Lang agreed but noted there also is a building <br />that would have to be demolished <br />40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.