Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />0 <br />JUR <br />13 <br />Boa <br />77 <br />FacE � <br />Public Works Director Davis continued <br />to maintain <br />that <br />staff <br />has had a consistent policy on these issues and they have used it <br />consistently, and all applicants have been given their options. <br />He noted, however, that staff has told the 6 acre site across the <br />street with the warehouse that they have to put in the turn lane <br />before they can get the CO, and now we have told this 2 acre site, <br />they don't have to, and that is inconsistent. <br />Lengthy debate ensued in regard to defining policy more <br />strictly in regard to who benefits and who will be specially <br />assessed, and Administrator Chandler suggested that if there is a <br />difference of opinion on whether the current policy has merit or <br />not, possibly we should just bring that policy back for a separate <br />discussion and clarification. The Board agreed it should be <br />brought back at another time. <br />Discussion continued regarding the Motion, and Commissioner <br />Bird clarified that the intent of the Motion is to approve this <br />project with the requirement of Mr. Hedin's escrowed funds and to <br />put the pressure on the DOT to go ahead and complete this left <br />turn project. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried 4 to 1 with <br />Chairman Wheeler voting in opposition. <br />ROAD RESURFACING PROGRAM FSY88/89 - ROAD 8 BRIDGE DIVISION <br />Public Works Director Davis reviewed the following: <br />82 <br />