6/27/1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

condition that they do not remove protected trees in that area, they will accept that. They just wish to control the landscaping at their entrance. Commissioner Scurlock asked if the developer could submit a plan of that for our later approval, and Mr. McQueen indicated they would have no problem doing that. COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK OFFERED A MOTION to approve staff recommendation as set out in their memo; to clarify Section 3 of that recommendation to have the developer submit a plan of their landscaping and handling of the 200' at their entranceway for the Board's approval; to have legal staff add whatever language is necessary to indicate that the Town and/or developer will mutually work with the County to adopt ordinances that are at least as restrictive as our County ordinances, especially those re tree protection and landscaping, etc. Board members had various questions and suggestions about conditions to be included in the Motion, and it was agreed: To include that they are going to give us 25' from the center line of the R/W in fee simple absolute. To include recommendation by Public Works Director Davis to widen the roadway to 20' minimum where minimum 120' radii and other horizontal curves are proposed.. To require that the buffer is going to be consistent with the Jungle Trail Management Plan or what they have proposed today, whichever is to the greater benefit of the County. To stay with staff's recommendation #3 re the conservation tract and buffer areas between the proposed new Trail and A -1-A except for a 200' area around the entrance road and have a landscaping plan submitted for that. To stay with staff's recommendation #4 re the 30' "habitable building setback" being granted to the County as a buffer area to be used only as set out; and To stay with the condition that we do not want the existing alignment of Jungle Trail to be built upon. 94 989 BOOK 77 Fm,,E 232 take anything out of there, and if the Board wished to put in a condition that they do not remove protected trees in that area, they will accept that. They just wish to control the landscaping at their entrance. Commissioner Scurlock asked if the developer could submit a plan of that for our later approval, and Mr. McQueen indicated they would have no problem doing that. COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK OFFERED A MOTION to approve staff recommendation as set out in their memo; to clarify Section 3 of that recommendation to have the developer submit a plan of their landscaping and handling of the 200' at their entranceway for the Board's approval; to have legal staff add whatever language is necessary to indicate that the Town and/or developer will mutually work with the County to adopt ordinances that are at least as restrictive as our County ordinances, especially those re tree protection and landscaping, etc. Board members had various questions and suggestions about conditions to be included in the Motion, and it was agreed: To include that they are going to give us 25' from the center line of the R/W in fee simple absolute. To include recommendation by Public Works Director Davis to widen the roadway to 20' minimum where minimum 120' radii and other horizontal curves are proposed.. To require that the buffer is going to be consistent with the Jungle Trail Management Plan or what they have proposed today, whichever is to the greater benefit of the County. To stay with staff's recommendation #3 re the conservation tract and buffer areas between the proposed new Trail and A -1-A except for a 200' area around the entrance road and have a landscaping plan submitted for that. To stay with staff's recommendation #4 re the 30' "habitable building setback" being granted to the County as a buffer area to be used only as set out; and To stay with the condition that we do not want the existing alignment of Jungle Trail to be built upon. 94