7/25/1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

for a single-family home site, which is all that is permitted to go on their property under the Zoning Code, the DER and the Corps of Engineers. The problem his clients have with the application for conceptual approval of this PRD lies wholly with what is westerly of Jungle Trail. Attorney O'Haire noted that his clients also own a 50 -ft. ingress and egress easement over the northerly 50 feet of the applicant's property, which has been used in the computation of green and open space for the conceptual review of the project. He emphasized that at the Planning 6 Zoning hearing on this matter, the applicant's consultant stated that they shared the same concerns that staff has on Tract E, which is the piece west of Jungle Trail, and would not be submitting the PRD on that section for quite some time. Attorney O'Haire stated that they would have no real problem with the Board granting conceptual approval to that part of the project lying between Jungle Trail and AIA, but would ask that the Board drop from conceptual approval of the PRD the area lying westerly of Jungle Trail until it can be revisited or redesigned. His clients have spoken with the current developers of the project and have not had any response from them on whether there is any flexibility with the proposed parking lot and dock complex. Frankly, they would like to have some time to -see if there isn't some way it can be worked out, because an RM -6 zoning or any non-residential use is not good planning or good zoning, and they feel it certainly would have a terrible effect on the value of their property. Commissioner Eggert understood that Condition #3 of staff's recommendation stipulates that the westerly tract would only be approved as a recreational tract and that no conceptual design would be approved at this time. JUL 2 5 1989 29 �11' 11 PIOCIK