My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/8/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
8/8/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:01:02 PM
Creation date
6/15/2015 4:43:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/08/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M M r <br />7. Landscaping and Buffering: <br />A 25' (minimum) landscape perimeter buffer area is provided <br />around the entire site. The combination of preserved trees, <br />planted trees, and hedging will exceed landscape require- <br />ments. The proposed perimeter buffering meets or exceeds <br />"Type B" landscape screening requirements. <br />8. Open Space: Required: 50% (total PRD) <br />Provided: 58%+ (total PRD) <br />[4 acre site: 49%] <br />9. Recreation Space: Requirement applies only to residential <br />unit development. Overall PRD exceeds requirements with golf <br />course, tennis, club, and bikepath facilities. <br />10. Drainage: A stormwater permit will be issued along with the <br />land development permit. Public Works has approved the site <br />plan drainage layout. <br />11. Utilities: Water and sewer services will be provided by the <br />County. Utilities permits will be obtained prior to issuance <br />of a land development permit. <br />12. Traffic Circulation: There are two basic alternatives to <br />site access from Indian River Boulevard. The -Public Works <br />director has approved alternative #1; alternative #2 is <br />possible and is under consideration; both are described <br />below. The developer has indicated that either alternative <br />is acceptable to him. <br />[Alternative #11 The site would be accessed differently in <br />the two phases of the project. In the first phase, the <br />project is to be accessed by a temporary stabilized, unpaved <br />driveway which is to connect to the existing Grand Harbor <br />Boulevard. The route of this road is to run along side the <br />Indian River Boulevard right-of-way. In the second phase, a <br />permanent paved driveway is to connect to the constructed <br />Boulevard at an approved future Boulevard median cut which is <br />to serve several parcels that "line up" with the median cut. <br />The applicant has submitted a certified cost estimate for the <br />phase 2 driveway construction as well as for construction of <br />4 deceleration lane, and has agreed to escrow funds to <br />guarantee construction. During land development permit <br />review, Public Works will have to approve the alignment and <br />specifications of the temporary driveway, as well as arrange- <br />ments for temporary re -alignment during Boulevard con- <br />struction. <br />[Alternative #2] There would be one permanent driveway built <br />toward the southern portion of the site to align with the <br />proposed median cut that is to serve the Grand Harbor office <br />park. Thus, under alternative #21 access would align with a <br />proposed median cut south of the site. <br />Alternative #1 driveway would share a common access point and <br />median cut with multi -family zoned property. The Alternative <br />#2 driveway would share a median cut with a proposed office <br />park. However, sharing the median cut with the office park <br />could alter current plans for a limited median cut design. <br />With more design information, required within the land <br />development permit application, the public works director can <br />determine which alternative is best from a traffic circu- <br />lation standpoint. <br />AUG 25 FOCI 7'7 <br />G,,U- 54 d <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.