My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/27/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
2/27/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:43 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 8:50:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/27/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Charles Fitch, 8075 134th St., expressed his opposition to <br />the paving. He noted that the church is not a resident per se, <br />and the residents feel no matter what the facility is, a bowling <br />alley or whatever, they do not want that type of traffic through <br />a residential allotment and they will not vote for the paving. <br />Mr. Fitch felt if the church weren't involved, there might be a <br />better chance of people considering the paving. <br />Gregory Gore, attorney for St. Sebastian Church, advised <br />that the church is in favor of paving the property and for quite <br />some time has agreed to the assessment. The church has been on <br />the property since October of 1983, and has had access to 134th <br />Street all that time except for the one year when there was the <br />barricade. Attorney Gore believed the church thought it would <br />be a movable barricade, and a permanent one was put in. He also <br />believed the county has received complaints from Sebastian <br />officials about the traffic impact on U.S.I. during the time of <br />church services. The church is of the position that it is <br />entitled to access to a county -maintained road, and there would <br />be a definite guarantee as to a movable barrier; it would be to <br />the churches' interest to limit access to the church property <br />from 134th Street only when there are church services. Attorney <br />Gore repeated that the church is in favor of the paving, but <br />whether there is paving or not, the church feels it is entitled <br />to access. The church is a taxpayer in the county and wants a <br />movable barricade. <br />Commissioner Wheeler asked if Mr. Gore was indicating that <br />on Sundays and such days as the church property is being used, <br />the property then would have an access from U.S.I and 134th St., <br />and this was confirmed by Mr. Gore. <br />Commissioner Wheeler asked if they would be shutting off <br />part of the church property so that people coming in from U.S.I <br />would leave on U.S.I and those coming in on 134th, would leave by <br />134th. Otherwise, he believed it will become a thoroughfare. <br />Attorney Gore felt that would be the natural flow. <br />31 <br />800 1 FA+�t Lo <br />FEB 271990 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.