Laserfiche WebLink
Fr- <br />sooK 80 <br />until next March because he didn't see any possibility of doing <br />that in September or October and he would question the <br />reasonableness of trying to propose that for November along with <br />the school board issue. <br />Chairman Eggert noted that it also would depend on whether <br />the legislature has to speak to it, so it could be later. <br />Attorney McDonough suggested that since we will know within <br />a week whether or not the Governor signs the new legislation, <br />perhaps the Board may want to readdress this issue in the next <br />week or so. In the meanwhile they could have some dialogue with <br />reference to some suggestions that Commissioner Scurlock has <br />made, and then maybe they could get right on board and have some <br />definite plans in terms of meetings and proceedings. <br />Chairman Eggert asked if Commissioner Scurlock wanted to <br />work with a committee, and Commissioner Scurlock said he would be <br />happy to. <br />Chairman Eggert felt perhaps the best thing to do would be <br />for the people who are here to work with Commissioner Scurlock <br />and then bring it forward to the Board when they have something <br />specific on whether it could be done under what the Governor has <br />signed or whether it needs special legislation or further <br />amendment. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt what he would like to do is have <br />them name their people to interface with him and, obviously, he <br />was going to have to work with the County Attorney's Office to <br />analyze the existing legislation that is on the books and then we <br />will determine a route. If there is a modification of that, we <br />can contact our local legislators and future potential <br />legislators and see what their thought processes are on it. <br />Attorney McDonough felt the sooner the better, and while <br />they understand everyone has heavy agendas, they were looking <br />forward to that dialogue. <br />30 <br />