My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/9/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
8/9/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:46 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 9:13:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/09/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AUG 0 9 1990 <br />Mr. Rohan! brought up the problem the county has been faced <br />with in having to take over package plants that were in bad shape <br />and advised that they held a workshop on the connection matrix <br />with the result that it changed their understanding of the <br />package treatment plant, and it was decided to relate it to the <br />amount of flow because in some cases so-called package plants <br />were actually glorified septic tanks. <br />Mr. Rohani continued to review criteria for connection to <br />the county's regional system, and Commissioner Bird asked how <br />much of these regulations are of our own initiative and how much <br />is mandated by state or federal regulations. <br />Environmental Health Director Galanis advised that in regard <br />to the subdivisions, that is basically strictly by state law, but <br />it is structured somewhat to ask that people connect to the <br />public sewerage. The use of septic tanks is pretty much by state <br />law with the exception of the 5,000 sq. ft. requirement in <br />commercial type activity being the point where you have to go <br />into a package treatment plant; that is by local design and <br />structure. Other than that, the county is pretty much following <br />the state rule, but attempting to see that the•new developments <br />have a future availability to connect to sewer. <br />Director Keating advised that with subdivision a 25 lot cap <br />is our own requirements, and as to the 5,000 sq. ft. requirement, <br />he believed the state requirement is 5,000 gallons. <br />Director Galanis confirmed that the state requirement is <br />according to flow where the county is using square footage and <br />there is no doubt the county requirement is more restrictive. <br />Director Keating pointed out that the state wants you to use <br />utilities provision as a growth management tool, and the DCA is <br />saying we did not do that good enough. <br />Commissioner Bird felt that we are being pretty hard on <br />commercial and industrial buildings in the 5,000 sq. ft. range <br />and possibly gallonage would be a fairer criteria. He cited the <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.