My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/9/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
8/9/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:46 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 9:13:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/09/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
instance of a 5,000 sq. ft. storage building that might have only <br />one bathroom. <br />Director Keating pointed out that those type buildings are <br />almost always in nodes or on a commercial corridor, and the whole <br />planning concept is to cluster those uses and have the node area <br />served by centralized sewer. <br />Commissioner B'ird noted that there are a lot of areas in the <br />county that have been zoned commercial for years where we don't <br />have public sewers available, and it was noted that the ordinance <br />does allow for the use of package plants in industrial or <br />commercial areas in certain cases. <br />Environmental Health Director Galanis advised that there are <br />10 or 12 approved products in the state, and they have installed <br />about 4 of those plants in the county in the last year. They are <br />permitted like on-site sewage disposal systems. The problem that <br />comes up is whether Utilities will accept them or not. <br />John Lang of Utilities stated that it is the current policy <br />not to accept these aerated septic tanks for operation or mainte- <br />nance because they are for an individual property owner rather <br />than being a public system. <br />Commissioner Bird felt that policy is fine, but at least let <br />them use those and operate until such time as the County <br />utilities system is available to them, and Mr. Lang confirmed <br />that is what we are doing currently. <br />Attorney Vitunac believed when there is no other way, the <br />policy is that the developer can have his own system, but on the <br />condition that he pay impact fees and when the county system <br />comes in, he will be required to connect. The County will never <br />be buying these package plants any more; they will simply be <br />forced out of business and required to connect. <br />Chairman Eggert asked for comments from the audience. <br />Todd Smith, of Peterson & Votapka, Engineers, noted that <br />there was some discussion in the workshop that rather than the <br />5,000 square footage requirement, this could changed to flow, and <br />BOOK 65' <br />AUG 09 1990 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.