8/9/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. Dill then referred to Section 954.07 in regard to the Cross Parking Agreement, which involves sharing and a deduction for non -concurrent uses, i.e., nighttime use rather than daytime. He wished to propose the addition of a third category which would allow a parking study in those cases where parking requirements are specific to a certain use. Mr. Dill noted that on Page 10, Paragraph 59 says that if you don't see a particular use that fits your use, you are supposed to go to the next similar use. Restaurants are listed, but how about a deli that is only open certain hours a day. He felt there are many commercial uses that may not need what is being required, and he, therefore, would like to see something that provides, if you want to challenge staff requirements, you can do your own study on your particular parking requirements. Commissioner Bowman returned to the meeting at 11:50 A.M. Mr. Dill referred to change of use and felt that at the time when an applicant goes to the Building Department for a permit to remodel their facility, there should be a checks and balance implemented that does not exist now so that a person could not get a building permit for a use that has not been approved on a site plan. If this can be caught at that stage, it will save a lot of aggravation down the road. Director Boling advised that for the last several months we have had a system in place for interior modifications so that whenever such an application comes into the Building Department, Planning checks it against the site plan and signs off on it. He then referred back to Mr. Dill's first point, and noted that using the example of a deli, for instance, that has certain hours when it begins operating andbonly 3 tables and you do a parking study based on that, but then what if he adds 3 tables and stays open 2 more hours? Director Boling felt that at some point.you have to balance all this out and must look at some kind of 27 BOOP AUG 0 9 1990 ��A11