My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/28/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
8/28/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2020 10:50:10 AM
Creation date
6/16/2015 9:41:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/28/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
This chapter contains the standards that are necessary for all <br />the rest of the Code to follow. <br />Commissioner Scurlock had a question on appeals in relation <br />to the Fire District. He noted that at one time we had a <br />difficult situation where there was some difference of opinion <br />about having the Board sit as the final arbiter of the decision <br />rendered by the Fire Chief on a termination. <br />Attorney Vitunac advised that the Fire Districts will be <br />covered under the Special Districts Chapter. <br />Commissioner Scurlock believed an employee of the Board has <br />the ability to go through Mr. Chandler and appeal and have a <br />final hearing before the 5 Commissioners, and asked if it is the <br />same process under Special Districts. <br />Attorney Vitunac advised the Fire District would come <br />through Mr. Chandler as Fire Administrator and then to the Board <br />as the Fire Commissioners. <br />Administrator Chandler confirmed that, in terms of the Fire <br />District, that would be covered by union contracts and their <br />grievance procedure, which is on up through the Chief, through <br />Doug Wright, and ultimately to the Commission. <br />Chapter 101 - Attorney Vitunac referred to Chapter 101, <br />Section 101.01, Composition of Board of County Commissioners, and <br />brought up the question of possibly electing a new Chairman and <br />Vice Chairman in November after the general elections in the <br />event the Commissioners holding those offices are not re-elected <br />to the Board. <br />After some discussion about the fact that you could have a <br />Chairman pro tem for the interim, it was the consensus that it <br />has worked well to elect the new Chairman and Vice Chairman at <br />the first Board meeting in January and that this is the way it <br />should continue. <br />There were no further comments on Chapter 101. <br />27 <br />AUG 2 8 1996 <br />a��oK <br />PAGE 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.