Laserfiche WebLink
retention areas. Any proposed development for the site must meet <br />the requirements of the county, the drainage district, and St. <br />John's River Water Management District. <br />Solid waste for the county is disposed_ at the county landfill in <br />the southern portion of the county. Collection is by private <br />hauler. The life of the existing landfill, with planned ex- <br />pansions, exceeds the planning period horizon of 2010. <br />ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS <br />In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the appli- <br />cation will be presented. The analysis will include a description <br />of the current and future land uses of the site and surrounding <br />areas, potential impacts on the transportation and utility sys- <br />tems, and any significant adverse impacts on environmental quali- <br />ty. The analysis will also assess the request for consistency <br />with the policies and objectives of the new comprehensive plan. <br />The analysis will examine the request and identify the impacts to <br />the surrounding property, the infrastructure, and the environment <br />as well as other impacts which could be expected to occur if the <br />request is granted. In addition, the requested change will be <br />reviewed in terms of the impact the land use change would have on <br />the other elements of the comprehensive plan. Since this request <br />involves a DRI, the analysis must consider the more detailed <br />information available in the DRI application for Development <br />Approval (ADA) and the proposed DRI development order (D.O.). <br />In the past, staff has applied a 3 part test to evaluate the merit <br />of comprehensive plan amendments. According to this test, an <br />amendment could be approved if it meets one of the following: 1) <br />to correct an oversight, 2) to correct a mistake, 3) to <br />accommodate changes affecting the subject property. This analysis <br />will evaluate the request based upon these criteria. <br />1. Development Potential <br />The starting point for the analysis is the development potential <br />of the parcel under the current and proposed land use desig- <br />nations. This development potential will.be used throughout the <br />analysis to identify' the impacts on the various man-made and <br />natural systems. <br />The current M-1, land use designation permits up to eight dwelling <br />units per acre. Assuming' the density provisions were maximized, <br />the current development potential of the 156 acre parcel would be <br />1248 units. <br />The development potential for commercial property is not as easily <br />determined; however,. assuming development at the .maximum allowed <br />in the CG district,- the site would permit a building envelope of <br />2,718,000 square feet (40%). This maximum lot coverage would be <br />reduced to ensure that the necessary parking, loading,_ access, <br />open space and drainage requirements are met. The DRI, as <br />proposed by the DeBartolo Corporation, includes slightly over 1.1 <br />million square feet of commercial development. <br />Since the subject parcel is the proposed site for a regional <br />shopping facility and because of the scope of such a facility, a <br />DRI review is being conducted along with the land use and rezoning <br />amendment analysis. The DRI Application for Development Approval <br />(ADA) and the staff review of the application have addressed the <br />potential impacts of the.proposed project as well as site specific <br />issues and required improvements. <br />