Laserfiche WebLink
SEP 2 5 1990 <br />ROOK F';qE 459 <br />Commercial Land Use Needs <br />In analyzing the request for the land use change and rezoning, <br />staff has focused on several key issues. One issue is regional <br />mall land availability. The Urban Land Institute estimates that <br />shopping centers require about 10 acres of site for each 100,000 <br />square feet of building area. Since regional malls are usually <br />750,000 s -quare feet or larger, a regional mall would therefore <br />require a site of at least 75 acres. Site requirements, of <br />course, are also influenced by local land development.and site <br />plan regulations. that determine the required parking, loading, <br />circulation, open space and drainage areas needed to support this <br />size shopping facility. Using this standard, the subject parcel <br />would be adequate for a regional.shopping facility. <br />According to the Future. Land Use - Element of the Comprehensive <br />Plan, there are 679 acres designated as commercial in 12 existing <br />commercial nodes. Of this total, 4.4% (305 acres) is presently <br />vacant. This does not include commercially designated land in the. <br />U.S. # 1 Commercial/Industrial Corridor or commercial/ Industrial <br />nodes. Overall, approximately 50% of the 5363 acres in all <br />commercial and industrial nodes is presently zoned commercial. It <br />must be pointed out that this supply is designated for a 20 year <br />period. <br />General commercial land is also available in the SR 60/Kings <br />Highway node. The subject node contains 160 acres and is zoned CL <br />and CG. Land uses within the node are as follows: Vacant land - <br />58 acres; Agriculture - 40 acres; Residential - 37 acres; and <br />Commercial - 25 acres. <br />The 40 acres devoted to citrus are unlikely to be developed <br />commercially in the near future, since much of it has been recent- <br />ly planted. In addition, the residential areas are largely <br />grouped and buffered from existing commercial uses, raising <br />questions concerning the likelihood of their conversion to commer- <br />cial uses in the near future. Furthermore, while no formal <br />proposal has been submitted, staff has been approached concerning <br />the option for residential development on the south side of S.R. <br />60, between 58th and 43rd Avenues. Thus, while this node has a <br />relatively large amount of land capable of development, all of the <br />land in the node is not likely to be developed commercially. <br />Further review of commercially designated lands reveals that, <br />other than the large commercial/industrial nodes located along the <br />interstate, only one node contains an adequate supply of vacant <br />land (over 75 acres) which is also in a configuration suitable for <br />a regional mall facility. Therefore, accommodating a mall in the <br />urbanized area of the- county would require redesignating property <br />to a commercial classification. Policy 1.20 of the Future Land <br />Use Element of the County's comprehensive plan requires that nodes <br />be designated at a size determined by their use, service area <br />population, existing land use pattern, availability of <br />infrastructure, and other demand characteristics. Based upon the <br />land use pattern of the area, the node's centralized location, and <br />its close proximity to the population center, expanding this node <br />boundary would provide for an efficient land use pattern and for <br />the maximum use of transportation and public facilities, while at <br />the same time decreasing sprawl or strip development, which would <br />occur in other nodes if their areas were increased to accommodate <br />the acreage necessary for the subject request. These character- <br />istics show that expansion of the node would be consistent with <br />Policy 1.21 of the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive <br />Plan. <br />Two other future land use element policies must be considered in <br />this analysis. These are policies 1.22 and 1.23. While the first <br />prohibits node expansion closer than 1 1/2 miles to an existing <br />20 <br />® M <br />