Laserfiche WebLink
BOOK 81 FACE 46 <br />As identified in the comprehensive plan, the solid waste; <br />generation rate for residential units is 1.6 waste generation' <br />units. For 124.8 dwellings the demand would be 1,996 Waste' <br />Generation Units. Commercial waste generation rates are l; <br />unit/100 square feet, resulting in 11,000 WGUs for the 1.1 million; <br />square foot facility. The landfill has the capacity to <br />accommodate these wastes without -comprehensive plan changes. <br />Offsite drainage for the -site is provided by the Indian River <br />Farms Drainage District. However, the maximum discharge rate; <br />adopted by the Indian; River Farms drainage District is 2" in 24 <br />hours; therefore, the remaining rainfall must be retained onsite <br />before release into the canals. The project's design for 19.51 <br />acres of onsite retention canals and wetlands will be capable of, <br />accommodating the remaining rainfall. <br />Based on these reviews, no changes are needed to the,' <br />Infrastructure Element. <br />° Recreation <br />The Recreation Element computes demand for facilities on a <br />population based formula. Since the proposed change is not <br />increasing residential units, there is no increase in demand or <br />required changes to this element. <br />° Mass Transit <br />Mass Transit is presently not available <br />Paratransit is available for those <br />disadvantages. Large scale uses such a <br />mall will serve as attractions which will <br />feasible in the future. <br />° Capital Improvements <br />in Indian River County. <br />with transportation <br />s the proposed regional <br />make mass transit more <br />As indicated in the traffic circulation section of this analysis, <br />several roadway and intersection improvements have been identified <br />as required improvements based on the proposed land use change and <br />project. Because of the concurrency requirements of the <br />comprehensive plan, these improvements must be provided concurrent <br />with the development of the project. If the proposed facility is <br />not developed, the roadway improvements would revert to their <br />original timing by the year 2010. <br />As identified in the Capital Improvements Element, traffic <br />circulation improvements are funded from a variety of sources. <br />These include traffic impact fees, gas taxes, 1� local option <br />sales taxes, and others. The expenditures related to these <br />sources are programmed for various years. Where a development <br />project requires that some of these expenditures occur sooner than <br />programmed to address a potential service level deficiency, the <br />board must approve this timing change. In some instances the <br />project developer may be required to pay for certain improvements <br />whose timing is not consistent with his project needs. As with <br />all development projects, the applicant must provide all <br />improvements which are project -related. <br />Traffic Circulation Policy 1.2 of the comprehensive plan requires <br />all roadway projects to be evaluated and ranked in order of <br />priority according to set guidelines. Consistent with policy 1.2, <br />the proposed improvements were evaluated based upon the <br />established criteria. As a result of this evaluation, the <br />proposed improvements qualify for an advancement in the capital <br />improvements program priority listing. Because all of the <br />improvements will be funded by the developer with only a partial <br />impact fee credit and because no proposed projects would be <br />26 <br />� � r <br />