9/25/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

L.� displaced which serve to preserve health and safety or correct existing deficiencies, the proposed improvements meet all the criteria for top priority. The following tables specifically identify necessary capital improvements required by the project. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT COSTS Roadway/Segment Improvement Length Total Cost Year ($000) Req S.R. 60 58th to 66th Ave. 2 Ln 1.0 mi. 2000 1991 58th 12th St. to 16th St. 2 Ln 0.5 mi. 700 1991 58th 16th to 12th St. 2 Ln 0.5 mi. 700 1993 58th SR 60 to 33rd St. 2 Ln 0.5 mi. 700 1995 43rd 12th St. to 26th St. 2 Ln 1.5 mi. 1500 1995 26th 58th to 66th Ave. 2 Ln 1.0 mi. 700 1991 Total 6300 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Intersection Improvement C.P. Timing Project Cost $ SR 60/58th Ave NB dual left --- EB through/right WB through/right U.S. 1/17th St. WB dual left --- 50,000 EB right 25,000 S.R. 60/66th Ave Signalization --- SR 60/58th Ave EB right --- SR 60/20th Ave SB right --- SR 60/43rd Ave NB dual left 58th/16th St. Signalization 100,000 175,000 *Intersection improvements included in roadway improvement costs. The capital costs for required roadway and intersection. improvements total an estimated $6.475 million by the year 1995. To reflect this added cost,.the Capital Improvements budget must be amended to_identify the funding sources for the $x:475 million in -traffic related improvements. Since the county has adopted. a - traffic impact. fee; most..roadway and transportation related improvements are funded from that source. Other traffic related improvements are funded through gasoline tax revenues. In this case, however, the improvements will- be entirely funded by developer contribution, with only a partial impact fee credit. The table below identifies that Capital Improvements funding. Source Amount (Mill) Development TIF $2.0 Developer Contribution 4.475 Total $6.475 SEP 25 1990 27 � oK � . F'aa