Laserfiche WebLink
_I <br />BOOK 81 pm,JE467 <br />The costs associated with roadway improvements will also.be offset <br />by indreases in revenue as a result of this project. At the <br />present time many local residents travel outside the county to <br />purchase goods and services. The development of the mall should <br />generate additional sales tax revenue. As an attraction, the <br />project is likely to spin off other development which will add <br />revenue through traffic impact fees, sales, and property taxes. <br />The development is also likely to produce some changes to the <br />existing north/south traffic pattern. As such., improvements in <br />other areas may .no longer be needed ''or may be delayed. The <br />attached Table 13.23 from the Capital Improvements Element titled <br />"Indian River County 5 year Schedule of Improvements, Fiscal Years <br />1990-91 to =1994-95", and Table 1.3.18 Indian River County Summary <br />of Revenues and Expenditures Projections by Element Category for <br />Capital Improvements Fiscal Years 1990-91 through 1994-95", <br />contains the revisions required by this request. <br />Conservation <br />Policies of the Conservation Element of the .Comprehensive Plan <br />call for measures such as the preservation of a minimum of 15% of <br />each native plant community which occurs on-site, which <br />particularly applies to the cabbage palm hammock area of the <br />property. Additionally, the wetland area on the site is also <br />subject to specific preservation/mitigation criteria. <br />Conservation policies will be implemented through the DRI <br />development order and site plan approval process consistent with <br />Objective 5 and Policies 5.1(e) and 7.2 of the Conservation <br />Element of the comprehensive plan. No changes to the <br />Conservation Element will be necessitated by the plan amendment. <br />Land Use Options <br />The land use plan amendment options include: (1) enlarging the <br />node to 316 acres by including the 156 acre area as proposed; (2) <br />adding the proposed 156 acres but removing other property from the <br />node; or (3) adding only a portion of the proposed area. The <br />first option has the advantage of permitting a large unified <br />development, but the disadvantage of adding to the oversupply of <br />commercial land. The second option would provide the same <br />benefits as the first without appreciably adding to the oversupply <br />of commercial land. Among the areas which could be considered for <br />elimination from the node are the 40 acres at the southwest corner <br />of SR 60 and 58th Avenue, currently planted in citrus or the <br />triangular area between the south side of SR 60 and the main <br />canal. The major land uses in this area are residential, <br />agricultural and vacant land. The difficult aspect of this option <br />is the downgrading of property which has "enjoyed" a commercial <br />land use designation and zoning. The last of the three options <br />would provide the additional commercial acreage required for the <br />mall and allow the development of property which is already <br />designated commercial. This option would also have the advantage <br />of providing multiple uses in the area and at the same time <br />breaking -up the linear pattern of the node. <br />CONCLUSION <br />It has been demonstrated that regional malls are special land uses <br />which have minimum size requirements and highly developed <br />infrastructure needs. While it has been clearly shown that there <br />presently exists an oversupply of commercially designated land in <br />the county, it has been demonstrated that inadequate sites exist <br />for a regional mall. Because of these factors, staff acknowledges <br />the need to redesignate land to accommodate a regional mall. The <br />subject site meets the criteria for designation of such a mall <br />site. The location is within an urban service area and is <br />capable of being served by three major roadways which with <br />28 <br />- M <br />