My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/6/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
11/6/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:47 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 9:52:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/06/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO: Members of the Board <br />of County Commissioners <br />FROM: Joseph A. Baird <br />OMB Director <br />SUBJECT: BUDGET AMENDMENT <br />NUMBER: 004 <br />DATE: October 30. 1990 <br />;ROAD IMPACT FEES - District VI <br />i.. • _L� _r rr__. 1 1 n1 —1 c9Z—Rd1 _ntir 1 7' C d nQn n <br />CR -512 -- FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILROAD CROSSING <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/29/90: <br />----------------------------------------------------------- <br />TO: James Chandler <br />County Administrator, <br />THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. <br />Public Works Director <br />FROM: Roger D. Cain, P.E. N� <br />County Engineer T <br />SUBJECT: CR512/Florida East Coast Railroad Crossing <br />DATE: October 29, 1990 <br />----------------------------------------------------------------- <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />County Staff has negotiated with the Florida Department of <br />Transportation a tentative agreement whereby Florida East Coast <br />Railroad would agree to the new crossing for westbound CR512 for <br />the closing of two existing crossings. In order to expedite this <br />process the Florida Department of Transportation has asked the <br />county 6 discuss this proposal and see if it is acceptable and <br />to return the county's reply to the Department of Transportation <br />as soon as possible. The department has also requested us to <br />provide them with the locations of the two crossings that could <br />be closed if this proposal is acceptable to the county. <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS <br />Florida Statutes 335.141 places responsibility for regulating <br />. .. •. `.» 'public railroad crossings with the FDOT. If the county did not <br />.'agree to this proposal,the FDOT could make a decision and the <br />"J county would have to contest the decision through the <br />administrative process. The chances of prevailing in this <br />process and getting a new crossing for closing none, or only -one <br />crossing, are not strong in staff's opinion. <br />NOV 6 1990 ..55 <br />I <br />BOOK Frt" 83 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.