Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Young submitted for the record copy of Stipulation for <br />Dismissal of Lappeman's Petition to Intervene, which copy is on <br />file in the Office of Clerk to the Board. <br />Director Keating referred the Board to the wording of our <br />Policy 1.31, as follows: <br />POLICY 1.31: Conservation land use designations shall be depicted <br />on the future land use map. The exact boundaries of the C-2 and C- <br />3 Conservation Districts shall be determined by environmental <br />survey. Any portion of a property which is depicted as C-2 or C-3 <br />on the future land use map but determined not to be environmentally <br />sensitive or environmentally important based upon an environmental <br />survey will have the same land use designation as the contiguous <br />adjacent property, except for land in the C-3 district east of the <br />St. Sebastian River which shall have an R, Rural, land use <br />designation if determined not to be environmentally sensitive or <br />environmentally important. <br />Conservation area boundaries shall be established through <br />environmental surveys using the following criteria: <br />•C-2 Areas. C-2 area boundaries shall be established based <br />upon the extent of wetland areas as defined in Conservation <br />Element policy 5.1. <br />•C-3 Areas. C-3 area boundaries shall be established based <br />upon soil types and xeric scrub vegetative characteristics. <br />The following soil types shall indicate C-3 areas: <br />Orsino fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes; or <br />• - Electia sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes <br />Mr. Young confirmed that their attorneys have reviewed this <br />wording and found it unacceptable. <br />Chairman Eggert did not see the difference in that wording <br />from what Mr. Lappeman's attorneys have proposed, and Mr. Young <br />noted that he did not think we would reach a resolution here. <br />They do have a petition before DCA; he felt sure this is going to <br />be an ongoing issue with the county and the DCA; and he just <br />wanted to exercise their right to object. <br />It was determined that no one else wished to be heard in <br />regard to adopting the remedial actions required by the <br />Compliance Agreement, and the Chairman closed the public hearing. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt we should approve the plan with <br />the current language and then the intervenor can resolve it with <br />DCA. <br />61 <br />MOO r <br />