My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/12/2010 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2010
>
10/12/2010 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2017 4:17:56 PM
Creation date
3/17/2016 12:32:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/12/2010
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4042
Book and Page
140, 001-034
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
9184
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Clerk's Note: Public Hearings 10.A.1. and 10.A.2. were heard conjointly). <br />PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE <br />OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD <br />Community Development Director Bob Keating stated that Public hearings 10.A.1. and <br />10.A.2 were related and could be combined; however, each item would require a separate vote. <br />Through a PowerPoint presentation (on file), he provided background, conditions, and a detailed <br />analysis on the requests of Corrigan et al: (1) for a text amendment to Future Land Use <br />Element (FLUE) Policies 1.22 and 1.36 to modify the County's C/I (Commercial/Industrial) <br />node policy and establish site specific use limitations for the redesignated land; and (2) for a <br />Future Land Use map amendment expanding the Urban Service Area (USA) and re -designating <br />the subject acres from AG -2 (Agricultural -2) to C/I. He explained that originally four property <br />owners, Corrigan Family Limited Partnership, Lambeth Citrus, Ltd , B.F. Bailey, III, and <br />Donald S. Beaty, had requested the amendments, but Mr. Beaty has withdrawn his application, <br />reducing the proposed redesignated property from *674.17 to *562 acres. Director Keating <br />thereafter confirmed the recommendations of both the Planning and Zoning Commission and <br />staff for Board approval of both Future Land Use Amendments through adoption of the proposed <br />Ordinances, excluding the Beaty property. <br />A broad -ranging discussion ensued, as staff responded to questions and comments from <br />the Board members. Several Commissioners mentioned that it seemed beneficial for Mr Beaty <br />to include his property in the Comprehensive Plan Amendments, and further deliberations <br />occurred on whether to table the public hearings for one week to allow him to reactivate his <br />application, if he wished. <br />Christopher H. Marine, Esquire, representing the four property owners, advised that <br />Mr. Beaty had been adamant about withdrawing his application from the Comprehensive Plan <br />Amendment applications. <br />8 <br />October 12, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.