Laserfiche WebLink
4.1.1 Survey Methodology <br />To obtain public input, the Consultant Team, with input from Senior Resource Association <br />and Metropolitan Planning organizationstaff designed <br />ructurdthesurvey questions were <br />deAg std'e2-question <br />urvey instrument is included in Appendix <br />designed to be simple and short, so the survey could be completed while passengers were <br />onboard. A total of 560 completed surveys were received. <br />The response rate for each question is listed in Table 4-1. As shown, most of the questions <br />had a high response rate (above 85%). <br />Table 4-1 Response Rate by Question <br />4.1.2 Survey Analysis four <br />The analysis of the on -board survey is divided <br />d comer SatisfactionsEintoachtsection 1 ustt is the <br />Trip Characteristics, Travel Behavior, and <br />survey results in a graphical format along with a description of the results. Since the survey <br />4-2 <br />- — R Staj f consubnts «c + <br />i <br />Response Rate I <br />ii <br />Question i; <br />Responses <br />Response Rate <br />Question ; <br />Q <br />Responses <br />90% <br />Q 1 <br />560 <br />° <br />100 /0 <br />- -Q19d _ , <br />- - - - -504 <br />- - - - - - — 3 <br />90% I <br />- - <br />Q2 <br />- -- <br />553 <br />0 <br />99 /0 1 <br />Q 19e <br />19f <br />Q19 <br />505 <br />o ° <br />90 <br />—Q3 <br />- 543 <br />97% <br />j <br />98%- <br />_ <br />Q g <br />— <br />497 <br />89% _ I <br />Q4 {, <br />550 <br />- <br />100% <br />Ql9h <br />488 - <br />87%0_- - <br />- <br />Q5 - <br />560 <br />- - <br />- - <br />40% <br />Ql9i { <br />491 <br />88%0_ <br />- <br />QSa <br />222 <br />99% <br />Q19j <br />487 <br />87% <br />Q6 <br />552 <br />o <br />96 /0 <br />Q19k <br />483 <br />86% _ <br />Q7 <br />i' 539 - <br />100% <br />Q191 <br />484 <br />86% <br />Qg <br />560 <br />546 <br />98% <br />Q19 <br />497 <br />g9% i <br />Q9 <br />Q10 <br />547- <br />98% <br />n <br />Q19n <br />475 <br />- - <br />', <br />85% <br />87%- <br />Q11 <br />5.44 <br />97% <br />{ Ql90 <br />488. <br />489 <br />_ <br />87% <br />Q12 <br />543 <br />0 <br />97/0 <br />19 <br />Q P <br />Q19q <br />- <br />_ <br />88% <br />Q13 <br />524 <br />94% <br />Q19r <br />4903 <br />88% <br />Q14 <br />519 <br />93% <br />- o <br />Q19s <br />- <br />494 <br />88% i <br />- Q 15 <br />468 <br />84 /o <br />o <br />100 /0 <br />Q19t <br />495 <br />88%_ - - <br />- <br />- Q16 <br />560 _ <br />- - -- <br />- - —79% <br />Q19u <br />493 <br />8 ° <br />88% <br />Q17 <br />:, 442 <br />o <br />91 /o <br />Q20 (1) <br />—336 <br />60% - - - <br />- - - - - - <br />- -Q18 <br />- - 512 <br />- - -92% <br />- - 20 (2) <br />Q <br />307 <br />S5% <br />Q19a <br />513 <br />90% <br />920 (3) <br />273 <br />49% <br />- --- - - -- -- -i <br />504 <br />- <br />- -- -- - <br />Q19c - <br />- 500 <br />- ;! <br />89% <br />� - - <br />- <br />4.1.2 Survey Analysis four <br />The analysis of the on -board survey is divided <br />d comer SatisfactionsEintoachtsection 1 ustt is the <br />Trip Characteristics, Travel Behavior, and <br />survey results in a graphical format along with a description of the results. Since the survey <br />4-2 <br />- — R Staj f consubnts «c + <br />