My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/08/2013AP
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2013
>
10/08/2013AP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2018 10:43:55 AM
Creation date
3/23/2016 9:03:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
10/08/2013
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
302
Supplemental fields
FilePath
H:\Indian River\Network Files\SL00000G\S0004NO.tif
SmeadsoftID
14229
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
During the selection phase, only project capability information is initially reviewed and scored by <br /> the selection committee, with information which could identify the firm omitted or redacted. <br /> Interviews are then held with all submitting firms, and scores assigned for that portion of' the <br /> review. Finally, the cost proposal and performance evaluations provided for "critical" team <br /> members (which are identified in the solicitation and can include the prime contractor, key <br /> subcontractors, project manager, etc.) are reviewed and scored. At this point, the firm with the <br /> highest overall score is identified as the best value candidate, and the selection progresses advances <br /> to the clarification phase. <br /> During the clarification phase, the agency and projected contractor work together to develop a <br /> project plan, which includes establishing and agreeing to milestones which will be assessed each <br /> week of the project, and which focus on risk management. The scope of work is also refined during <br /> this phase with input from both entities. <br /> Once both parties are satisfied with the plan and milestones established, the selection moves on to <br /> the third phase, management by risk evaluation, during which the contract is awarded and executed <br /> and work may begin. <br /> Prevalence <br /> Staff has contacted Polk County directly and has requested information from other counties and <br /> municipalities around the State to seek input from other entities that may be utilizing the BVP <br /> process. Polk County officials indicate that they are not aware of any other entity in Florida <br /> currently utilizing this process. Additionally, County staff has not found any other local <br /> governments in the State using BVP at the current time. It is also important to note that Polk County <br /> only uses BVP on Utilities Capital Improvement projects presently. Other departments in Polk <br /> County utilize a procurement process other than BVP. Their staff has determined complex projects <br /> are best suited for BVP, and Utilities projects are preferred because that department is most <br /> supportive of the process. No metrics have been compiled to quantify the benefit they believe they <br /> receive from BVP. <br /> A summary of BVP solicitations undertaken by Polk County since 2009, as listed at <br /> www.pbsrg.com is shown in the table below. <br /> Project Date Budget Status <br /> Van Fleet Water Production Facility 9/21/2012 $3,500,000 (Est.) In <br /> Improvements Procurement <br /> Imperial Lakes Water Treatment Plant 6/11/2012 $6,000,000.00 In <br /> Improvements (Est.) Procurement <br /> SWRUSA Pressure Reducing Stations 10/19/2010 $613,000 (Est.) Cancelled <br /> Modifications <br /> New Mann Road WPF Facility & Palmore Well 9/20/2010 $2,710,800 (Est.) Cancelled <br /> Interconnect <br /> New Holly Hill WPF and Reclaim &Re-Pump 6/8/2010 $8,583,154 (Est.) Awarded <br /> Facility <br /> Utilities Construction Services 6/8/2010 N/A Awarded <br /> Cottonwood Fire Rescue Station 6/2/2010 $1,300,000 (Est.) Awarded—Bid <br /> Protest <br /> \\Files u2TubliclPurchesing\Mitcell.nmus Agendes\Sest Value Procurement•100817-FMAL.doc <br /> 144 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.