My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/08/2013AP
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2013
>
10/08/2013AP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2018 10:43:55 AM
Creation date
3/23/2016 9:03:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
10/08/2013
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
302
Supplemental fields
FilePath
H:\Indian River\Network Files\SL00000G\S0004NO.tif
SmeadsoftID
14229
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Project Date BudgetStatus <br /> Saddle Creek Fire Rescue Station 6/2/2010 $1,300,000 (Est.) Awarded—Bid <br /> Protest <br /> In addition to Polk County, PBSRG's listed municipal clients are the states of Alaska, Idaho, New <br /> Mexico, Oklahoma, and Oregon, cities of'Columbia SC, Phoenix AZ, Rochester MN, and Roseville <br /> MN and Hennepin and Olmsted Counties in Minnesota. <br /> Involvement by ASU and Cost <br /> The PBSRG provides initial training to staff on the best value procurement process and also offers <br /> support services, including independent verification of the vendors' past performance information <br /> provided as part of the procurement process (if requested). <br /> Per agreement with ASU, using entities are restricted from releasing actual cost of the program to <br /> other municipalities. <br /> Polk County itself is no longer under contract with ASU and can now utilize the processes <br /> developed independently, however, consulting fees are due to ASU if further assistance or guidance <br /> is requested or required. <br /> Our Method <br /> Currently, Indian River County utilizes questionnaires completed and submitted with the bid to <br /> gather and verify qualifications of submitting firms. The Purchasing Division has determined this is <br /> the most common process to vet bidder capabilities within the state of Florida. <br /> While the County does request contact information for previous clients, reference checks are <br /> currently completed via telephone. County questionnaires and documents could easily be expanded <br /> to include such surveys in order to more explicitly include past performance as part of our bid <br /> evaluation process. <br /> Other Methods <br /> The National Institute for Public Procurement (NIGP) just released a position paper discussing <br /> methods through which entities can increase value in procurement. Several methods are suggested <br /> for use, as appropriate, Design-Build and Construction Manager At-Risk; both methods Indian <br /> River County has utilized in the past. <br /> ANALYSIS: <br /> Suggested benefits of the BVP process include elimination or reduction of change orders resulting <br /> from the management by risk evaluation process. Accountability and buy-in of the ultimate awarded <br /> contractor is said to be enhanced as a result of the project planning that takes place prior to award <br /> and contract execution. <br /> Potential negatives to the process include significant increase in time required to complete the <br /> procurement process, increase in senior staff time to participate in the process, and reduction in <br /> participation by smaller, local firms in the solicitation process. Cost and time required to set up the <br /> process and train staff to execute it(both Purchasing and technical staff) should also be considered. <br /> NFdmse 2%KjblicWurchaningWl melkneaua Ageadul9est Value Proarrament-IOOU3-FTNALAce <br /> 145 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.