My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/08/2013AP
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2013
>
10/08/2013AP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2018 10:43:55 AM
Creation date
3/23/2016 9:03:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
10/08/2013
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
302
Supplemental fields
FilePath
H:\Indian River\Network Files\SL00000G\S0004NO.tif
SmeadsoftID
14229
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
As shown in 'Cable 1 above, Polk County typically assigns 20 points out of a total of 100 points to <br /> Cost. The remaining 80 points are awarded primarily for the risk assessment plan, project <br /> approach/schedule, and interview. Staff has concerns that this process could result in the selection <br /> of a vendor that submits a significantly higher cost proposal than other proposers since cost <br /> accounts for a relatively minor portion of the total score. This could have the unintended <br /> consequence of increasing the cost of projects procured through the BVP process. <br /> While Polk County is pleased with the BVP process and satisfied they are enhancing the value of <br /> their projects, no statistics are currently available to document their view. <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> Staff recommends the County continue to the competitive bidding process for construction projects, <br /> and not pursue the BVP process utilized in Polk County. Staff further suggests the Board approve <br /> the implementation of requesting written performance evaluations from previous clients, as <br /> appropriate. This would be beneficial in the evaluation and award process, and would incorporate <br /> one of the benefits of BVP. <br /> SOURCE OF FUNDS: <br /> Dependent upon the pricing package negotiated ASU, there may be an upfront cost to initially <br /> subscribe to the BVP process,as well as per project or annual fees. <br /> There are no costs associated with enhancing the bidder questionnaire and the associated <br /> performance evaluation. <br /> ATTACHMENTS: <br /> Full Sample Polk County Bid Package(On file in BCC Office) <br /> Sample Timeline from Polk County Bid Package <br /> Sample Bid Submittal Package <br /> Sample IRCO Bid Questionnaire <br /> Proposed Performance Evaluation Form <br /> APPROVED AGENDA ITEM <br /> Indian River Co Amftved Dat <br /> Admin <br /> BY: Legal al <br /> oseph .Baird, County Administrator Budget t <br /> De artment <br /> �jjh Risk Mana er <br /> FOR. l,% <br /> 1\F lsor TrA Ubl c%Pumha,-PSW'scel-neout Agmdaiwest Value Pnx-rmenf•100817-FINAL doe <br /> 146 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.