6/18/1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

JUN 18 1991 mclK, 83 F',�GE WG DCA Objections As indicated in the Description and Conditions section of this staff report, the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) made several objections to the subject plan amendment. Each of the - objections addressed insufficient analysis relating to the demand on public facilities by the proposed request. To address those objections, planning staff have revised the format of the Concurrency of Public Facilities sub -section of this staff report to include specific information relating to the demand on public facilities by the proposed land use amendment, based upon the -county's adopted levels of service and the most intense use allowed by the proposed plan amendment. That analysis demonstrates that public facility service levels will be maintained even with development of the site at the most intense level allowed under the proposed land use designation. With this analysis, staff feels that DCA's objections have been adequately addressed. Concurrency of Public Facilities The site is located" within the County Urban Service Area (USA), an area deemed suited for urban scale development. The comprehensive plan establishes standards for Transportation, Potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage, and Recreation. The adequate provision of these services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. The comprehensive plan also requires that new development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum adopted level of service standards for these services and facilities are maintained. As per Section 910.07 of the County's Land Development Regulations, conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since comprehensive plan amendments and -non-PD (Planned Development) rezoning requests are not projects, county regulations call for the concurrency review to be based upon the most intensive use of the subject property based upon the requested zoning district or land use designation. For residential comprehensive plan amendment requests, the most intensive use (according to the county's LDR's) is the maximum number or units that could be built on the site, given the size of the property and the maximum density under the proposed land use designation. The site information used for - concurrency analysis is as follows: 1. Size of Property: 14 acres 2. Existing Zoning Classification: IG, General Industrial District ' 3. Existing Land Use Classification: C/I, Commercial/ Industrial Node 4. Proposed Zoning Classification: RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre) 5. Proposed Land Use Classification: L-2, Low -Density Residential (up to 6 units/acre) 6. Maximum Number of Units for Proposed Plan Amendment: 84 Units - Transportation A review of the traffic impacts that would result from the proposed development of the property indicates that the existing Level of 10= -