6/18/1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

On November 15, 1990, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5 to 0 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners deny transmittal of the request to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs. On December 11, 1990, the Board of County Commissioners voted 5 to 0 to transmit this request to the Department of Community Affairs - (DCA), for their review and comment. Planning staff received DCA's Objections, Recommendations,. and Comments (ORC) Report on April 22, 1991. The DCA's objections to this proposed amendment focused on three areas. These were inconsistencies with Chapter 9J-5 (FAC)/Chapter 163 (F.S.); inconsistencies with the state comprehensive plan; and indonsistencies with the comprehensive regional policy plan. Although there appear to be a significant number of objections to this amendment, that is not the case. Essentially, DCA's objections fall in two categories; objections to the public facility demand analysis and objections to land use impacts of the amendment. - Regarding the former, it was DCA's position that the public facility analysis did not consider the most intense use of the property under the proposed land use designation and did not consider adopted level of service standards. Regarding the latter, it was DCA's position that the proposed amendment would result in -strip commercial development and would conflict with the county's policies on node separation and node expansion. These issues are addressed in the Analysis section of this staff report. Existing Land Use Pattern The subject property is zoned RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential District and is currently undeveloped. The property directly east of the subject property is zoned CL, Limited Commercial, and is currently undeveloped. The property west of the subject property is zoned RM -6. South of the subject property the land is also zoned RM -6 and. contains_ single-family residential uses and undeveloped property. North of the subject property the land is zoned RS -3, Single -Family Residential District,- and is currently mostly undeveloped. :`Future Land Use Pattern The subject property is designated L-2, Low -Density, on the county's future land use map. The L-2 designation permits residential densities up to 6 units/acre. All property to the . :. west, north a'nd south is also designated L-2. Property to the east .z.. --,,.`.is designated part of the Oslo Road/27th Avenue Commercial Node, which permits commercial zoning designations. Environment r The property is not designated as environmentally important or environmentally sensitive by the comprehensive plan, nor is it within a floodplain as identified by the Flood Insurance Rating Maps (FIRM). Utilities And Services -- The site is within the urban service area of the county, and county water lines extend to the site; however, sewer lines do not extend to the site. Transportation System The property abuts Oslo Road to the south. Oslo Road is classified as an urban principal arterial roadway on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map. This segment of Oslo Road is a two lane JUN ifi 1y111N_Pll 143 Roos V uC. ��P�t2