My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/18/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
6/18/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:09 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:29:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/18/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUN 18 199' <br />�oo� Fr E 6,_0o <br />With respect to this request, staff worked with the applicant to <br />develop the proposed mixed use land use designation amendment. <br />This designation is structured to correspond to the DCA's criteria <br />for non -urban sprawl rural development. The concept is that a <br />large mixed use project which provides opportunities for living, <br />shopping, working, and taking care of other daily needs internally <br />will create a self-sufficient community, will capture most of the <br />trips internally, will preserve natural and agricultural areas, and <br />will not cause urban sprawl. These mixed use planned development <br />projects will provide meaningful controls and regulations for <br />development of agricultural areas while discouraging urban sprawl. <br />This mixed use designation would be established upon approval of a <br />mixed use project meeting the specific criteria set out in the <br />proposed mixea. use designation amendment. These criteria will <br />ensure that project residents will have the opportunity to live, <br />work, shop, and take care of other daily necessities within the <br />-project. Since the mixed use designation is a floating zone and <br />will be approved only upon an applicant's request, the number of <br />mixed use projects that will be established and the number of <br />people that will be attracted are not known. With establishment of <br />minimum separation distances between such districts, however, the <br />number of potential projects/districts can be limited, and the <br />potential population increase can be controlled. <br />Attachment "A" identifies the proposed changes to the data and <br />analysis section of the Future Land Use Element to address the <br />mixed use designation and provides the proposed new policies <br />establishing the mixed use designation. The proposed amendments to <br />the plan include the following: <br />Changes to the sprawl section of the data and analysis <br />portion of the.Future Land Use Element. <br />Revision to Policy 1.2 of the Future Land Use Element and <br />creation of a new mixed use designation. <br />- Addition of two new policies to the Future Land Use <br />Element which establish criteria for a mixed use <br />designation. <br />On November 15, 1990, the Planning and Zoning Commission, acting as <br />the Local Planning Agency, conducted a public hearing for the <br />purpose of making a recommendation to the Board of County <br />Commissioners regarding this request. At that meeting the Planning <br />and Zoning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the <br />request as presented by staff with one change. Staff had <br />recommended that at least twenty (20%) percent of the total housing <br />units be affordable housing units; the Planning and Zoning <br />Commission recommended this percentage be changed to (10%) percent <br />instead. The Planning and Zoning Commission also recommended- <br />transmittal'of this request to the DCA. <br />On December 11, 1990, the Board of County Commissioners voted 5-0 <br />to transmit the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment, with changes <br />as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission, to the <br />Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for the DCA's ninety <br />(90) day review. On April 19, 1991, the Florida Department of <br />Community Affairs (DCA) issued its Objections, Recommendations, and <br />Comments (ORC) Report. <br />The DCA's ORC report included a number of substantive objections to <br />this proposed amendment. While many of these objections focussed <br />on insufficient location criteria and project development <br />standards,•others referenced a lack of justification to establish <br />the -need for such a land use designation. <br />70 <br />- M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.