Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />SEP 2 4 1991 <br />BOOK . 4 5 df <br />the Con -mission's support but he personally preferred this be done <br />by referendum. <br />Mir. Dorsky felt if it goes to referendum, it won't happen. <br />While it is true'that each citrus owner only has one vote, a <br />referendum --is based on the land percentage represented. <br />Chairman Bird commented that he has no problem with them <br />annexing our 70' beach access. <br />Commissioner Scurlock stated that he is not ready to vote on <br />this today but would like to talk to some more property owners. <br />-He is not only concerned about the large property owners as it is <br />possible some of the smaller owners, don't want this either, and <br />he would like there to be an opportunity for those people to <br />express their views to us in some way, a <br />Mr. Dorsky believed that this is coming before the <br />Legislative Delegation on October 17th. <br />Commissioner Eggert continued to emphasize that while she <br />has no problem with the annexation, her problem is how it is <br />being done, and she felt the people should be able to speak. <br />Chairman Bird asked if we can't take a position that we <br />don't oppose the.annexation as such but our preference would be a <br />referendum approach. <br />Commissioner Bowman felt that was a "cop-out," and that it <br />is wrong to ram this down people's throats. <br />Mr. Dorsky asked if the Board would go along with the <br />County's Comprehensive Plan policy if the vote goes against <br />the annexation. <br />Attorney Vitunac pointed out that our policy is just to <br />provide technical data and help - not to sponsor Bills. <br />Chairman Bird favored trying the referendum route first. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com- <br />missioner Scurlock, the Board, understanding that we do <br />have an enclave problem, unanimously requested that the <br />Town of Indian River Shores try the referendum approach <br />to the proposed annexation, and if the referendum fails, <br />then this could be brought back for reconsideration. <br />WEST/CENTRAL REGION REUSE WATER TRANSMISSION MAIN <br />The Board reviewed memo from Environmental Engineer Wisemen: <br />76 <br />