Laserfiche WebLink
_ M <br />have a difficult situation. Mr. Prince related it would be very <br />disappointing not to be awarded this job when he is the legitimate <br />low bidder and qualified in every aspect of the bid documents. <br />Chairman Eggert asked if Guettler met the criteria of <br />completing three golf courses in three years. <br />Commissioner Scurlock said they exceeded that criteria. <br />Attorney Clem argued that Prince Contracting met the criteria <br />and is qualified and he hoped the project would be awarded to the <br />low bidder. <br />Attorney Eugene O'Neill, representing Guettler & Sons, Inc., <br />came before the Board and stated the Commissioners were obligated <br />to make decisions which are in the best interest of Indian River <br />County. He said arbitration is a process to make findings and the <br />Commission can take that into consideration, but it is also <br />reasonable for the Commission to believe what is heard from the <br />individuals who were involved in the project. Mr. O'Neill listed <br />the projects Guettler has completed satisfactorily and which staff <br />considered in making their recommendation. He read the legal <br />definition of "lowest bidder" and reminded the Commission that <br />County ordinance states a contract should be awarded to the bidder <br />who has submitted the bid that is in the overall best interest of <br />the County. He also mentioned that Guettler is currently working <br />on clearing the area for the golf course and would be in a position <br />to continue and finish the project sooner than if another <br />contractor were hired. <br />Commissioner Wheeler recalled our experience in hiring <br />contractors for several different projects and having problems on <br />one project, but the other projects were done on time and <br />satisfactorily. He felt that there is a bid process and as long <br />as Prince Contracting was qualified, given the fact that his bid <br />was lowest, he should be awarded the contract. The fact that he <br />had problems on one project should not outweigh the difference in <br />the bids. He said he would vote contrary to staff's recommendation <br />and follow our bid process. <br />Commissioner Scurlock pointed out that we are following our <br />bid process because the process allows us the option to consider <br />experience and investigate the bidder's past history. In this <br />case, there were five people contacted and two of them said they <br />would not hire Prince again, whereas on Guettler, nine people were - <br />contacted and they all said they would rehire that company. <br />Commissioner Wheeler clarified that he had not discussed this <br />subject with anyone. He listened to staff, Mr. Prince and Attorney <br />Clem in the morning prior to this meeting, and read the backup <br />documents. <br />47 <br />FEB _ BOOK <br />