2/25/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Orr V li �!vC TO: James Chandler County Administrator- THROUGH: dministratorTHROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Director and �� Roger D. Cain, P.E. County Engineer FROM: Michelle A. Gentile, C. T. Civil Engineer SUBJECTi Public Hearing for the Paving & Drainage Improvements to a Portion of the Roads in Floral Park Subdivision and Ranch Estates Subdivision DATE: February 18, 1992 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On January 28, 1992 the Board of County Commissioners adopted Resolution No. 92-18 providing for certain paving and drainage improvements to a portion of the roads in Floral Park Subdivision and Ranch Estates Subdivision. A portion of the roads in Floral Park Subdivision, 57th Avenue, 57th Court, 42nd Street, and 43rd Street are being presented to the Board at this time. The legal descriptions are shown in the Providing Resolution. 56th Avenue is not included due to the fact that the owner of the property on the east side of 56th Avenue is, in the process of developing a Site Plan and will be required to donate right-of-way along the 56th Avenue corridor. The benefited area and assessment roll for 56th Avenue will be determined when the issues regarding the Site Plan on 56th Avenue are settled. We will be requesting a St. Johns River Water Management Permit for all construction in Floral Park Subdivision, at this time however. When the original petition was brought in for Floral Park and Ranch Estates in February 1986, there were approximately 51% of the property owners in favor of having this road paved, based on the benefited area at that time. Since then, we have eliminated some of the lots from the benefited area, the north portion of 56th Avenue is an unopened right-of-way at this time, and lots fronting this portion of 56th Avenue will not be included in the assessment. The assessment being presented today has 63 lots and of those 63, the owners of 35 lots have signed the petition. This makes 56% of the assessment roll in favor. Also on this assessment roll, we have signatures representing 50% of the property owners. On January 28, 1992, the Board of County Commissioners adopted another Resolution 92-19 setting the date and time for a Public Hearing to discuss the advisability, cost and amount of the assessment against each property owner. This hearing is scheduled for February 25, 1992. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the assessment roll, and confirming resolution with changes, if any, made after input at the February 25, 1992 Public Hearing. The revised confirming resolution and assessment roll will be forwarded_ to the Chairman of the Board for signature. The Assessment Roll and assessment plat are on file with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners office. 28