4/21/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

APR 211992 BOOK 66 Commissioner Scurlock announced that he has talked to the County Attorney's office and he has no conflict of interest in this matter and plans to vote on the issue. ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously approved staff's recommendation of Alternate No. 1 to approve Guettler & Sons' final pay request in the amount of $8,270 and withhold $450 as liquidated damages for failure to complete within 100 calendar days. COPY OF CHANGE ORDER #4 (FINAL PAY REQUEST) IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD PHASE III - CHANGE ORDERS NO. 6 AND 7 The Board reviewed the following memo dated 4/10/92: TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P .E., .ti Public Works Director �'!� FROM: Terry B. Thompson, P.E. Capital Projects Manager SUBJECT: Indian River Boulevard, Phase III Change Order No. 6 and No. 7 DATE: April 10, 1992 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS FILE: irb3co6/7.agn During the construction of - Indian River Boulevard, unsuitable soils and limerock have been encountered. Since these materials were not shown on the original drawings, change orders have been necessary during the earthwork and pile driving phases. The pre -design geotechnical firm, Universal Engineering Services, is of the opinion that the soil borings they Provided to Boyle Engineering adequately reflect subsurface areas of consolidated materials and unsuitable soils. The attached letter from Ron Barnett of Boyle Engineering dated Jan. 29, 1992 explains why the contract documents did not reflect the conditions that have been encountered. The attached Change Order No. 6 includes increases in the amount of $45,706.25 for pre -drilling pile holes through rock, removing rock under structures, and excavation, hauling and disposal of unsuitable material. Various other incidental items bring the total increase amount to $53,729.69. C:i]