My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-131
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2010's
>
2016
>
2016-131
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 2:33:59 PM
Creation date
10/12/2016 11:29:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Agreement
Approved Date
09/13/2016
Control Number
2016-131
Agenda Item Number
8.E.
Entity Name
Florida Department of Transportation
Subject
Program Agreement 43rd Ave. improvements
Area
Aviation Blvd. to Airport Drive West
Project Number
431725-2-58/68-01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAP Performance Evaluation <br /> January 2016 <br /> Select One S) The Agency provided a request for Department concurrence to award the project to the <br /> lowest responsive bidder.The Agency provided a bid tabulation and bid analysis (or other <br /> supporting documentation in the case of design/build projects). (Tied to LAP Manual, <br /> Chapter 21 Construction Advertising and Award Procedures) <br /> 1 The Agency did not request concurrence, or the Department had to prompt the agency <br /> for the request and associated documents multiple times. <br /> 2 The Agency requested concurrence and supplied all documents. Department had to <br /> request additional information to supplement the information provided. <br /> 3 The Agency requested concurrence and supplied all supporting documents without <br /> Department prompting. Documents supplied were sufficient and no additional <br /> information was needed to provide concurrence. <br /> Select One 6) The Agency's submitted a final contract containing all federal and state requirements prior <br /> to contract execution. (Tied to Construction checklist) <br /> 1 The Agency's did not submit a final contract to the Department prior to contract <br /> execution. <br /> 2 The Agency's submitted a final contract to the Department prior to contract execution, <br /> but federal and/or state requirements were missing and a revision of the document was <br /> required. <br /> 3 The Agency's submitted a final contract containing all federal and state requirements to <br /> the Department prior to contract execution. <br /> Select One 7) The Agency uploaded required construction advertisement and award documents into <br /> LAPIT. Required documents include: bid tabulation, bid analysis, executed contract. <br /> 1 The Agency did not utilize LAPIT and/or required constant follow-up from the <br /> Department to use LAPIT. <br /> 2 The Agency utilized LAPIT and entered documents with minimal prompting by the <br /> Department. <br /> 3 The Agency utilized LAPIT and entered documents and data without prompts by the <br /> Department. <br /> Total 0 <br /> Count 0 <br /> Average NaN <br /> Construction <br /> Adverstisement <br /> and Award <br /> Comments <br /> Page 8 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.