Laserfiche WebLink
4. NEARLY ALL FLIGHTS TAKE OFF & LAND FROM/TO THE SOUTH. THIS IS BECAUSE <br />THE TWO HANGARS ARE LOCATED ON THE NORTH END OF THE RUNWAY. NO <br />PLANE WOULD DESIRE TO TAXI ON THE GRASS RUNWAY UNLESS ABSOLUTELY <br />NEED -ED. <br />5. THE RUNWAY IS 3950'+/- LONG. HOWEVER, THERE ARE TWO ENDS ON THE <br />NORTH END OF THE RUNWAY. ONE IS THE TEMPORARY END (THIS IS ABOUT 650' <br />SOUTH OF THE PERMANENT END AND HAS BEEN THE END EVER SINCE THE <br />HANGARS WERE CONSTRUCTED). THE OTHER IS THE PERMANENT END THAT IS <br />RIGHT TO OUR PROPERTY LINE. THE PERMANENT END CAN NOT BE USED UNLESS <br />THE HANGARS WERE REMOVED. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE MINIMUM <br />RUNWAY LENGTH REQUIRED BY THE FAA IS 1800' FOR A PUBLIC AIRPORT. <br />THEREFORE THE RUNWAY (USING THE TEMPORARY END) IS STILL 1500' LONGER <br />THAN REQUIRED. PLANES NOW USE A MA)MgUM OF 1500' OR LESS OF THE <br />RUNWAY TO TAKE OFF AND LESS TO LAND. <br />6. THERE ARE TWO HANGARS, ABOVE GROUND GAS TANKS AND PUMPS, AND <br />FERC TANKS LOCATED AT THE NORTH END OF THE RUNWAY. THE DIAGRAM <br />ON ATTACIIlKIIVT 7 SHOWS THESE ARE NOT IN THE CLEAR ZONE BUT WE THINK <br />THE ATTACHMENT IS NOT TO SCALE AND THE THEY ARE IN THE CLEAR ZONE <br />7. THE PILOTS THAT USE THIS AIRPORT ARE REGULARS. IT WOULD BE RARE FOR A <br />PILOT TO USE THIS AIRPORT THAT IS NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE CONDITIONS. <br />8. WE CAN NOT UNDERSTAND HOW THE COUNTY ALLOWED THIS AIRPORT TO HAVE <br />THE RUNWAY RIGHT UP TO OUR PROPERTY LINE. WE HAVE REVIEWED THE <br />COUNTY COMMISSION MEETING NOTES AND WE HAVE FOUND THAT THERE WAS A <br />LOT OF PROBLEMS WITH THE OLD HIBISCUS AIRPORT ON 12th STREET. WHY DID <br />THE COUNTY ALLOW THESE PROBLEMS TO REOCCUR AT THE NEW HIBISCUS <br />AIRPORT WE HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO FIND THE COUNTY COMMISSION MINUTES <br />'%`HERE THE NEW HIBISCUS AIRPORT WAS APPROVED. WE WOULD LIKE THE <br />COUNTY TO FIND THESE MINUTES FOR US SO WE CAN REVIEW THEM. <br />9. BY PASSING THESE RULES BOTH ON HEIGHT AND USE, THE COUNTY HAS TAKEN <br />ALL USES AWAY FROM OUR PROPERTY THAT IS IN THE CLEAR ZONE. WE FEEL WE <br />SHOULD BE COMPENSATED AND PLAN TO TAKE ANY ACTION NEEDED TO <br />CORRECT THE PROBLEM OR GET COMPENSATED. <br />OUR RECOMMENDATIONS: <br />1. HEIGHT NOTIFICATION ZONE: IF THIS PROPOSAL IS PAS SED WE COULD ONLY <br />BUILD TO A HEIGHT OF ABOUT 1" AT THE REAR OF OUR PROPERTY AND 25' AT THE <br />FRONT WITH A HEIGHT VARIANCE ALLOWING THE 20 TO 1 SLOPE. IF WE WERE <br />HELD TO THE I TO 100 SLOPE, IT WOULD BE ONLY 6' AT THE FRONT. AS YOU CAN <br />SEE, IF WE CAN NOT OBTAIN A VARIANCE THE WESTERN PORTION OF OUR <br />PROPERTY IS WORTHLESS & WE CAN NOT BUILD ON THE EASTERN PORTION DUE <br />TO THE GAS PIPELINE EASEMENT. EVEN IF WE ARE GRANTED THE 1 TO 20 <br />15 <br />MAR m 2 1993 BOOK 88 FKlJF.905 <br />