My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/2/1993 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1993
>
3/2/1993 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:52 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 12:49:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/02/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 88P 9,.6 <br />,1GE : <br />VARIANCE THIS WILL STILL SEVERELY RESTRICT DEVELOPMENT. THE RUNWAY IS <br />ONLY 160' WIDE. WHY DOES THE OVER FLIGHT ZONE NEED TO BE 250' TO 450' WIDE. <br />THE PLANES ARE SILALL AND DO NOT HAVE LARGE WING SPANS. WE FEEL THE <br />COUN71'Y SHOULD USE THE TEMPORARY END OF THE RUNWAY FOR THEIR. CLEAR <br />ZONE SINCE THIS HAS BEEN AND WILL CONI= TO BE THE END AS LONG AS THE <br />HANGARS REMAIN IN PLACE. <br />2. THE PROHIBITED USES IN THE OVER FLIGHT ZONE ARE THE HIGHEST AND BEST <br />USES FOR OUR PROPERTY AND EXACTLY WHAT WE PURCHASED THE PROPERTY <br />FOR WE RECOMMEND THAT YOU ALLOW ITEM (IV) HOTELSIMOTELS, ITEM (V) <br />GASOLINE STATIONS, AND RETAIL. WE WILL AGREE TO ELIMINATE ITEM (I), (II), <br />AND (III). STAFF HAS GN -EN YOU OPTIONS TO CHOOSE UNDER THE OTHER SIMILAR <br />USES. WE AGREE Vi nH STAFF THAT OPTION B IS BEST. HOWEVER WHY 30%. <br />HOWEVER, WE FEEL THAT THE ZONING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ALREADY <br />ALLOWS A LIMITED LOT COVERAGE. IF WE WERE IN DOWNTOWN, I CAN <br />UNDERSTAND A REDUCTION WOULD BE REQUIRED. AGAIN, WE FEEL THE COUNTY <br />SHOULD USE THE TIM4PORARY END OF THE RUNWAY AS THE STARTING POINT FOR <br />THEIR CLEAR ZONE. <br />3. NOISE IMPACT' ZONE: WE DO NOT FEEL THAT THIS SHOULD APPLY TO OUR <br />PROPERTY SINCE IT IS ZONED COMMERCIAL AND THERE ARE A LIMITED NUMBER <br />OF FLIGHTS. THE PLANES THAT USE THE AIRPORT ARE NOT LOUD JETS. <br />PLEASE CONSIDER OUR POSITION & PROPERTY RIGHTS BEFORE YOU PASS THE <br />PROPOSED ORDINANCE. AS YOU CAN SEE IT WILL SEVERELY AFFECT OUR USES <br />AND VALUE. IT MAY EVEN MAKE OUR PROPERTY UNBUILDABLE. THANKS IN <br />ADVANCE FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. <br />Sig Lysne, 109 Prestwick Circle, half owner of Indian River <br />Flying Service which is owner of New Hibiscus Airport, stated that <br />46 years ago they received approval for Old Hibiscus Airport, and <br />22 years ago they received approval for the present location. He <br />clarified that the end of the runway is not temporary. The State <br />required what is called a displaced threshold to avoid moving trees <br />and fences. The displaced threshold has nothing to do with the <br />hangars. The planes take off and land depending on wind conditions <br />and since Florida is influenced by the prevailing southeast winds, <br />planes take off and land to the south. The hangars do not <br />influence the takeoff pattern. The runway was built where it is to <br />allow for expansion. Mr. Lysne agreed that a gas station should <br />not be prohibited because of the airport. The gas transmission <br />line would prohibit certain uses but that is their decision. Mr. <br />Lysne stated that he wants to get along with his neighbors. While <br />he runs an honorable, although sometimes disagreeable, occupation <br />which makes some people unhappy, agriculture is important in this <br />area and he does provide a service. <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.