My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/25/1993
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1993
>
5/25/1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:53 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:07:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/25/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MY 2 5 1993 NOX 89 D -UF 617 <br />members and the subject application received only three affirmative <br />votes, the favorable recommendation technically failed. <br />On November 17, 1992, the Board of County Commissioners voted 5 to <br />0 to transmit the proposed land use amendment request to the state <br />DCA for their review. The Board took this action after stating <br />that OCR, Office, Commercial, Residential, would be the most <br />intense zoning district that they would approve when the rezoning <br />issue is addressed at the final adoption hearing. <br />Subsequent to Board approval, staff transmitted the subject <br />amendment request to DCA for their review. On March 15, 1993, <br />planning staff received DCA's Objections, Recommendations, and <br />Comments (ORC) Report. The DCA ORC Report contained one objection <br />to the subject amendment. That objection was that the proposed <br />amendment does not discourage the proliferation of urban sprawl, <br />because the county already has too much land designated as <br />commercial/industrial based on population projections and <br />commercial/industrial land needs. <br />As with all proposed amendments to the county's comprehensive plan, _ <br />the Board of County Commissioners is now to decide whether or not <br />to adopt the requested land use designation and zoning. <br />Existing Land Use Pattern <br />The subject property is zoned RS -6, Single -Family Residential <br />District. Two of these lots --are vacant. The other four are <br />developed with single-family homes. The parcel across 9th Street, <br />to the north of the subject property, is zoned CL, Limited <br />Commercial, and contains a small retail plaza. To the west of the <br />subject property are lots within the Ridge Acres Subdivision. This <br />area is zoned RS -6, Single -Family Residential District, and <br />contains single-family homes. The properties across 8th Street, <br />south of the subject property are within the Reams Glen <br />Subdivision. This subdivision is also zoned RS -6, Single -Family <br />Residential District, and contains single-family homes. To the <br />east, across Old Dixie Highway, the land is zoned CH, Heavy <br />Commercial. Most of this area, however, is used as a mobile home <br />park (a non -conforming use). Knight and Mathis Company's metal <br />fabricating plant, along Old Dixie Highway near 9th Street, is also <br />in this area. <br />Future Land Use Pattern <br />The subject property is designated L-2, Low -Density Residential, on <br />the county future land use map. The L-2 designation permits <br />residential densities up to six units/acre. All properties to the <br />west and south are also designated L-2. Properties to the east and <br />north are designated C/I, Commercial/ Industrial,, which permits <br />commercial and industrial zoning designations. <br />Environment <br />The property is not designated as environmentally important or <br />environmentally sensitive by the comprehensive plan; no wetlands or <br />native upland plant communities exist on site. Existing vegetation <br />on undeveloped portions of the property consists largely of <br />nuisance exotic Brazilian pepper and Australian pine. A few <br />scattered native trees are on the overall property as part of <br />single-family home landscapes. <br />According to Flood Insurance Rating Maps, the subject property does <br />not contain any flood hazard areas. <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.