6/22/1993 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

F-- - I JUN 22 1993 BOOK 89 pnF 920 -1 Chairman Bird led discussion regarding the Phase III Water Expansion project and asked what portion of that project would be affected by an expansion of the urban service area. Director Pinto responded that it would not be a major change, but the costs must be recalculated. Chairman Bird led discussion regarding the differences in paving projects and water service projects, and why petition paving works while water service projects are not always feasible on the basis of petitions. Chairman Bird favored deleting the Cherry Lane area from this Phase III water project and refiguring the costs for the balance of the project. He thought we must provide water to the rest of the areas because of the undersized lots and for the protection of our environment as well as for future development of those areas. Director Pinto pointed out that we have four other phases of water expansion to build, and the engineering and design of those water lines is part of the assessment. If the Board intended to reduce the urban service area or to specify that areas like Cherry Lane will not receive water service, we should address that change. Chairman Bird explained that he did not propose that we reconfigure the urban service area to cover projects which are planned for the next year or two. Cherry Lane will remain in our 20 -year plan, but the Board should have the flexibility to decide whether it is in the priority category. ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED by commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously directed staf f to proceed with Phase III of the Water Main Expansion Growth Plan excluding Cherrywood Estates and Cherry Lane Manor, recalculate the costs and assessments, and schedule a public hearing on this project. (Resolution 93-108A adopted at meeting of 7/27/93 after clarification of Board's intent to do so) TOURIST TAX STATUS REPORT The Board reviewed memo from County Administrator Jim Chandler dated June 17, 1993: 56