My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/5/1994
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1994
>
4/5/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:04:24 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:50:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/05/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br />APR m 1994 <br />boar. 92 FACE .56 <br />9. CONCLUSIONS <br />We have concluded from our investigation and study that the existing HVAC systems in this <br />building are not capable of maintaining acceptable indoor air quality by today's standards for the <br />following reasons: <br />A. Almost all of the air handling systems have inadequate outdoor air flowing into the building <br />as prescribed by ASHRAE 62-1989. Some of the air handling systems have no outdoor air <br />connections. If outdoor air connections were added these units would not have the <br />capability to remove the additional moisture. <br />B. None of the air handling systems have any type of positive humidity control such as reheat <br />or face and by-pass damper. Humidity readings taken throughout the building were 68% <br />or greater. These readings were taken in February when there was not much sensible load <br />but without positive humidity control, these units will not remove enough moisture from <br />the air at any time during the year. <br />C. None of the air handling systems are equipped with adequate filters required by today's <br />standards. Current acceptable practice is to install high efficiency filters in all air handling <br />systems. The existing air handling units do not have the capacity of receiving or <br />functioning with high efficiency filter. <br />D. All air handling systems have or have had standing water in the condensate pans. When <br />built, these units were not available with fully drainable pan. <br />E. In areas where above ceiling fan coil units (three story area) are the only source of cooling <br />there. inadequate air circulation. These units are very old and are left from the original <br />hospital building (possibly 30t years old). <br />F. Chilled water temperature being circulated is 51°Ft not cold enough to accomplish the <br />necessary dehumidification. This is caused by controlling the chiller from return water <br />temperature a trial modification made to reduce the cost of electricity. <br />G. Resistance to chilled water flow in many of the fan coil air units and the air handling units <br />is so high that the unit coils do not receive enough chilled water flow. This probably <br />caused by scale build-up or undersized pipe in the original design. <br />H. Since part of the system is four pipe (have a hot water coil and a chilled water coil) and <br />part is two pipe (having a combined coil) the change over from cooling to heating is very <br />difficult This makes it impossible to maintain conditions during seasonal changes. <br />I. A large percentage of the ductwork contains dirt and must be cleaned or replaced. <br />J. Chilled water system is not fully redundant and only two small old chillers back up the <br />existing chilled wathr system. <br />In view of the foregoing, it is not considered practical or in most cases possible to retrofit the <br />existing -system to a condition that will maintain adequate indoor air quality. <br />32 <br />- M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.