My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/12/1994
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1994
>
4/12/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:04:24 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:55:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/12/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
fi00K 92 FAur"..1Q� <br />APR .12, 1194 <br />parking, and pedestrian and vehicular circulation <br />on-site including loading, unloading and queuing of <br />school bus traffic; <br />3. Safety features of the development plan; <br />E. No rooms within the school shall be regularly used for <br />the housing of students when located in a single family <br />residential district; <br />F. The facilities shall have a Type "C" buffer in the A-1, <br />A-2, A-3, RFD, RS -1, RS -21 RS -3, and RS -6 districts; <br />G. The facilities shall have a Type "D" buffer in all other <br />residential districts not listed in subsection F above. <br />15. Setback Proposals: There were several building setback <br />scenarios discussed at the March 10th Planning and Zoning <br />Commission meeting. These scenarios included the 50' setback <br />as required by the LDRs and proposed by the applicant, a 100' <br />setback as proposed by Sandpointe Subdivision property owners, <br />and a 75' setback as recommended by the Planning and Zoning <br />Commission. Attachment #5 illustrates the various setback <br />scenarios discussed. A 50' building setback from the property <br />line would result in a 135' separation distance between school <br />buildings and adjacent residences, while 100' and 75' building <br />setbacks would result in separation distances between school <br />buildings and adjacent residences of 185' and 160', <br />respectively. Attachment #6 illustrates the 125' building <br />separation resulting from the existing development <br />configuration (without the land swap). <br />Note: At the March 10th Planning and Zoning Commission <br />meeting, St. Edwards representatives indicated that they would <br />agree to a 60' setback for 1 story buildings and a 75' setback <br />for 2 story buildings. This proposal by the St. Edwards <br />representatives is not a standing offer. The proposed <br />conceptual plan still depicts the required 50' setback. <br />16. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: <br />North: Sandpointe West Subdivision/RS-3 <br />South: The Moorings Golf Course/RS-3 <br />East: S.R. A -1-A, Sandpointe Subdivision/RS-3 <br />West: Indian River/N/A <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Based on the analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County <br />Commissioners grant special exception use and conceptual plan <br />approval for the St. Edwards Upper School expansion with the <br />following conditions: <br />1. That school enrollment shall not be increased beyond 375 <br />students without county review and approval of the impacts <br />associated with such increase. <br />2. That all required perimeter buffer improvements be installed <br />prior to final inspection or prior to the issuance of a <br />Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.) for the first phase of project <br />development, and that said buffer shall contain a 6' opaque <br />feature along the site's West Sandpointe Lane frontage. <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.