My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/12/1994
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1994
>
4/12/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:04:24 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:55:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/12/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.37 states that: <br />By 1993, Indian River County shall conduct a corridor study <br />for each roadway which serves as an urban service area <br />boundary. A corridor includes road right-of-way and property <br />within one-quarter mile of land area on both sides of the <br />right-of-way. The Kings Highway Corridor is hereby designated <br />as a high priority corridor study area. For each corridor <br />studied, the analysis shall identify programmed infrastructure <br />improvements, particularly water and sewer lines. Where water <br />and sewer lines are planned for installation within the right- <br />of-way of a roadway serving as the urban service area <br />boundary, the study will examine the financial, environmental <br />and physical impacts of providing urban services to land on <br />both sides of the right-of-way. Based upon the study results, <br />the existing urban service area designation and land use plan <br />designation for lands within the corridor will be assessed, <br />and necessary changes will be identified. Any identified <br />changes shall address the need to reduce the size of the Urban <br />Service Area boundary depicted on the Future Land Use Map in <br />order to compensate for any recommended expansion of the Urban <br />Service Area boundary to discourage the proliferation of urban <br />sprawl, to ensure the separation of urban and rural land uses <br />and to maintain the relationship between the needs of the <br />projected population and the land uses depicted on the Future <br />Land Use Map. Such changes shall then be considered by the <br />Board of County Commissioners as proposed comprehensive plan <br />amendments. <br />In April 1993, staff completed the corridor study mandated by <br />Future Land Use Element Policy 1.37 (see attachment 2). Based on <br />that study, a land use designation -amendment request was initiated <br />by the county. That amendment request involved expansion of the <br />USA to include all land within a quarter of a mile from roadways <br />for which utility line installation is programmed to be completed <br />by 1995, as well as the fast growing 58th Avenue corridor which was <br />designated a high priority in Future Land Use Element Policy 1.37. <br />As proposed, that amendment would also have changed the land use <br />designation of the land added to the USA from AG -1, Agricultural -1 <br />(up to 1 unit/5 acres) to R, Rural (up to 1 unit/acre). <br />On April 22, 1993, the Planning <br />hearing to consider that land i <br />public hearing, concerns wer <br />increase in density. Citing <br />Zoning Commission voted 5-0 to <br />Commissioners transmit to DCA <br />expand the USA, but which would <br />of the subject property. <br />and Zoning Commission held a public <br />se designation amendment. At that <br />raised regarding the proposed <br />these concerns, the Planning and <br />recommend that the Board of County <br />a land use amendment that would <br />not change the land use designation <br />On June 22, 1993, the Board of County Commissioners considered the <br />land use designation amendment request to expand the USA and <br />redesignate land from AG -1 to R. At that time, the Board voted not <br />to transmit the proposed amendment to DCA for its review; instead, <br />the Board directed staff to research the issue further and to <br />schedule a Board workshop to discuss the issue in more detail. In <br />taking this action, the Board indicated that it wanted to revisit <br />the comprehensive plan's utility provisions in general, rather than <br />focusing only on USA expansion. <br />In a staff report for a July 27, 1993 Board w3rkshop, staff <br />identified Potable Water Sub -Element Policy 5.9 and Sanitary Sewer <br />Sub -Element Policy 5.9 as prohibiting extension of water and sewer <br />services outside of the USA. At that workshop, the Board directed <br />staff to initiate a comprehensive plan text amendment, revising <br />85 <br />APR 12 1994 <br />FOOK 99 176 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.