Laserfiche WebLink
There are some minor design conflicts between the two plans. Staff <br />will rely on the initial submittal to control. These "conflict" <br />items include the location of the proposed tennis court and the <br />location of the 10' Type "C" buffer. In the new plan, the buffer <br />is partially located in the same area as the existing.5' drainage <br />easement located along Sandpointe Lane; the original plan.clearly <br />shows that the buffer will be located outside of the existing 5' <br />easement. Also, the initial plan provides a 10' off-site landscape <br />easement along the western boundary of the project within which a <br />Type "C" buffer is to be constructed. The Type "C" buffer is to be <br />constructed by others, but will be maintained by St. Edwards. With <br />the understandingthat the original plan controls over the revised <br />plan on these minor items, staff finds that the revised conceptual <br />plan is consistent with the county's land development regulations. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Based upon the analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County <br />Commissioners grant special exception use and conceptual plan <br />approval (revised design plan sheet attached as an amendment to the <br />original conceptual plan set) for the St. Edwards Upper School <br />expansion with the.following conditions: <br />1. That school enrollment shall not be increased beyond 375 <br />students without county review and approval of the impacts <br />associated with such increase. <br />2. That all required perimeter buffer improvements be installed <br />prior to final inspection or prior to the issuance of a <br />certificate of occupancy (C.O. ) for the first phase of project <br />development, and that said buffer shall contain a 6' opaque <br />feature along the site's West Sandpointe Lane frontage. <br />The Chairman opened the Public Bearing and asked if anyone <br />wished to be heard in this matter. <br />Bill Stewart, attorney representing St. Edward's School, <br />advised that they have come to agreement on the site plan changes <br />proposed at the last meeting by the residents of Sandpointe and <br />their counsel, Attorney Bruce Barkett. The only difference between <br />the parties is that Mr. Barkett wishes to have some-:_.of.these issues <br />made conditions of approval. <br />Attorney Stewart summarized the items discussed with the <br />Sandpointe West, noting that the revised site plan reduces the <br />middle school building from two stories to one story; increases <br />setbacks in some areas; decreases the amount of parking spaces; <br />calls for a sloped roof; and reduces the square footage to 24,000 <br />ft. They also discussed some convenience issues, and St. Edward's <br />has agreed to construction taking place only during normal business <br />hours. Another concern was about the lighting of the tennis courts <br />if they are moved, and St. Edward's will accommodate that. The <br />residents of Sandpointe West and Attorney Barkett indicated that <br />they would cooperate in the vacation of that portion of the plat <br />involved and also in releasing that property from the Declaration <br />QTR 6 1994 <br />