My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/26/1994
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1994
>
4/26/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:04:24 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:02:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/26/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12. Street Name Request: Section 951.05(4)(b) requires that new <br />roadways bear street number designations in order to provide <br />for a uniform road addressing and designation system. The <br />applicant has requested the ability to utilize street name <br />designations for the project roadways. Some street name <br />designation requests have been approved for subdivision <br />projects located on the barrier island (e.g. Seaview <br />Subdivision). This is due to the predominance of a street <br />name road system that already exists on the barrier island. <br />The area surrounding the subject site contains existing <br />development served by roads bearing street number <br />designations. Maintaining and continuing the street number <br />designations is necessary and consistent with the Chapter 951 <br />standards which were formulated to ensure the efficient <br />delivery of emergency services and mail, and for ease of <br />locating residences. It is staff's position, as well as the <br />Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation, that the <br />applicant's request to utilize street name designations should <br />be denied. The project should be required to utilize street <br />number designations pursuant to Chapter 951 standards. <br />13. Requested Waivers: The applicant has requested the following <br />waivers, pursuant to the provisions of PD section 915.15(1). <br />The following is a comparison of the zoning district <br />requirements and the proposed waivers: <br />Rs -3 RM -6 Proposed <br />Development Single -Family Development <br />Development Standard <br />Minimum Lot <br />Size <br />12,000 sq.ft. <br />7,000 sq.ft. <br />4,000 sq.ft <br />Minimum Lot <br />Width <br />s0' <br />70' <br />50' <br />Setbacks: <br />Front yard <br />25' <br />251 <br />15' <br />Rear yard <br />25' <br />25' <br />51 <br />Side yard <br />15' <br />10' <br />0/101* <br />Side corner <br />25' <br />25' <br />10' <br />Pools, pool <br />decks, patios, <br />& screed <br />10' <br />10' <br />51 <br />Rear perimeter 25' 25' <br />25' PD setback <br />*Note: There will be a10' side yard setback for a home from one <br />side lot line, and 0' along the opposite side lot line (see <br />attachment #4). <br />*Roof Overhangs: The applicant is also requesting that roof <br />overhangs be allowed to be placed within 3' of a side property <br />line rather than within 61, as normally required by code. The <br />3' is acceptable to staff as long as the overhang does not <br />encroach into publicly dedicated easements. <br />•Roadway Design: The applicant is requesting that the minimum <br />allowable right-of-way width be reduced from 50' to 341. The <br />Technical Review Committee members have approved the 34' <br />right-of-way, with the provision of 10' easements on either <br />side of rights-of-way, thereby providing an effective 54' <br />width for infrastructure improvements. The plans depict such <br />easements. <br />19 <br />APR 2 61994 BOOK 92 wx 271 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.