Laserfiche WebLink
policy states that these residential uses must be located within an <br />existing or future urban service area. <br />Since the subject property is located within an area designated as <br />L-1 on the county's future land use plan map and is located within <br />the county's urban service area, and the proposed zoning district <br />would permit residential uses no denser than three units/acre, the <br />proposed request is consistent with Policy 1.11. <br />While policy 1.11 is particularly applicable to this request, other <br />comprehensive plan policies also have relevance. For that reason, <br />staff evaluated -the subject request for consistency with all plan <br />policies. Based upon• that analysis, staff determined that the <br />request is consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br />Compatibility with the Surrounding Area <br />Staff's position is that granting the request to rezone the subject <br />property to RS -3 will result in development which will be <br />compatible with surrounding areas. Since land to the north and <br />east (with the exception of the previously referenced fifty foot <br />wide strip) is currently zoned RS -3, the request is for an <br />expansion of the existing zoning pattern. <br />Based on population projections and current development patterns, <br />residential development in this area of the county is expected to <br />increase, and eventually become the dominant land use. This <br />development pattern would be consistent with the comprehensive plan <br />since the area is located within the Urban Service Area and is <br />designated for residential development with densities of up to <br />three units/acre. <br />Any potential incompatibilities associated with residential <br />development on the subject property would be with' the adjacent <br />agricultural areas. These incompatibilities, however, will be <br />somewhat mitigated since the site is large enough to buffer itself <br />from adjacent agricultural uses as required in Future Land Use <br />Element Policy 6.3 of the comprehensive plan and section <br />911.O4(3)(c)5b of the County LDRs. For these reasons, staff feels <br />that the requested RS -3 zoning would be compatible with the <br />surrounding area. <br />Potential Impact on Environmental Quality <br />Environmental impacts of residential development on the subject <br />property would be essentially the same under either the existing or <br />the proposed zoning district. In fact, changing the zoning of the <br />subject property from A-1 to RS -3 may enhance environmental quality <br />by encouraging residential development of the site which is <br />currently a grove. <br />The environmental quality of the site may be enhanced by <br />residential development, because site development would result in <br />construction of a stormwater management system, and protection of <br />jurisdictional wetlands which may be on site. Due to the county's <br />stormwater retention requirements for residential development, <br />residential development on the subject property would reduce the <br />amount of stormwater runoff from the site. The requirements for <br />residential development contrast with the present agricultural <br />design that allows runoff to occur without any stormwater <br />retention. <br />Prior to residential development of the site, the applicant would <br />be required to complete an environmental survey to determine the <br />extent of any jurisdictional wetlands and. native upland plant <br />35 � p�,� �' <br />800 9 1pm'l045 <br />July 26, 1994 <br />