My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/11/1994
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1994
>
10/11/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:04:26 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 2:44:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/11/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1'0Oy W PAGE 496 <br />It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the <br />Chairman closed the public hearing. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Adams to grant Oak <br />Harbor's conceptual Planned Development Plan <br />modification and Special Exception Use request <br />with the condition outlined in staff's <br />memorandum. <br />Under discussion, Commissioner Macht asked the extent of the <br />accessory commercial property. <br />Director Boling explained that they were allowed up to 10,000 <br />square feet building and land area for accessory commercial, and <br />that figure was based on the number of units (20 square feet per <br />unit) occupied. The general public would not be attracted, because <br />of sign regulations, to the accessory commercial which was intended <br />for residents of the development. <br />Commissioner Eggert cited the memo as saying the commercial is <br />to be contained within the clubhouse facility, and Director Boling <br />clarified that the commercial use would be located on the same site <br />as the clubhouse, not necessarily the same building. <br />Steve Moler, with Masteller & Moler, Inc., explained that <br />neighborhood commercial will be developed in the same design <br />structure as the clubhouse facilities. <br />Commissioner Macht indicated the concern was due to their <br />recent unpleasant experience with a commercial enclave in a <br />predominantly residential neighborhood and wanted assurance that <br />the opportunity did not exist for future problems to arise in this <br />situation. <br />Director Boling responded that the opportunity for complaints <br />always exists, but this accessory commercial was in the plans from <br />the very beginning. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION. The motion <br />was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />24 <br />October 11, 1994 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.