Laserfiche WebLink
Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element <br /> Through the LRTP and CMP processes, the MPO identified potential future intersection <br /> improvements at many of these locations. These potential intersection improvements include <br /> adding turn lanes; adjusting signal timing; and making ITS improvements. <br /> • Advanced Right-of-Way Acquisition <br /> , . <br /> s - :. Thoroughfare Plan roadways will eventually require additional <br /> right-of-way acquisition by the county. According to the 2030 LRTP, right of way costs to <br /> . - - ! ! ' .. . . . . .. . . . -- . To ensure <br /> that sufficient right-of-way is available for future construction projects, the county should <br /> develop a balanced capital improvement program that includes advanced right-of-way <br /> acquisition funding along with construction funding. <br /> Because of the increase of low intensity, non-urban uses outside of the urban service area, the <br /> county needs to ensure that this kind of development does not preclude the eventual extension of <br /> the roadway grid system. If the future land use map is eventually amended or if the urban service <br /> area is extended, maintaining adequate access in these areas will be critical in connecting the <br /> county system of roads. For identifying and protecting essential right-of-way, the primary <br /> mechanism is the Extended Roadway Grid Network (Figure 4.10). As development continues, <br /> this grid network should be protected by requiring appropriate land dedication through the site <br /> plan and subdivision approval process. <br /> • Other Needs <br /> Besides the Cost Feasible Plan roadway capacity improvements and intersection and right-of- <br /> way needs, there are other traffic circulation system needs that must be addressed. These other <br /> needs include bridge improvements, resurfacings, and safety projects. Cost estimates for these <br /> improvements were obtained from programmed and proposed project listings; from historic costs <br /> per lane mile; and from growth projections. These costs are listed alongside Cost Feasible Plan <br /> improvements-in the transportation capital improvements program(Table 4.9.4). <br /> • Cost Feasible Plan Improvements <br /> The MPO's 20-30 cost feasible roadway improvements plan is depicted in Figure 4.8 (Table <br /> 4.9.3). When all cost feasible improvements are completed, the roadway network laneage in <br /> Indian River County will have increased substantially, as shown in Figure 4.9. Because of this <br /> additional capacity, future roadway level of service will be maintained above the adopted level <br /> of service as for those roadways. This is demonstrated on figure 4.9A. <br /> Table 4.7.1 Existing Roadway Characteristics <br /> Link On Street From Street To Street Len th No.of Exist Road Existing Juris- Functional LOS <br /> ID g Lanes ROW Type LOS diction Class Standard <br /> S.R.AlA S.County Line S.VB City L 4.70 2 100 U A SR MA D <br /> Community Development Department Indian River County 96 <br /> APPENDIX A—Transportation Amendments <br />