Laserfiche WebLink
Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element <br /> 2. It provides for the integrated and systematic planning as well as the orderly <br /> development of highway construction and improvement programs in accordance <br /> with actual needs; <br /> 4. It permits the clear and logical application of funding policies to specific types of <br /> highways in that functional classification is used to determine which roadways are <br /> eligible for federal funding; <br /> 5. It provides stability in system responsibilities, since functional characteristics do <br /> not fluctuate significantly over time. <br /> As adopted, the Transportation Element uses the federal functional classification system which <br /> the Florida Department of Transportation also uses. Table 4.7.1 lists each thoroughfare plan <br /> roadway by its functional classification, name, existing functional type, and other characteristics. <br /> In 2004, Indian River County and FDOT undertook a reclassification study of the roadway network <br /> in Indian River County. As a result of that study, the functional classification of several roadways <br /> was changed. At present, virtually all paved highways in the county east of 1-95 are classified as <br /> urban, with the exception of 66th Avenue (45th Street— CR 510); Oslo Road (west of 58th Avenue); <br /> and 82nd Avenue(south of 8th Street). <br /> As shown in Figure 4.3.1,minor arterials include 27th Avenue(St. Lucie County to Oslo Road); 43`d <br /> Avenue (St. Lucie County to 53`d Street); 58th Avenue (SW 13th Street to CR 510); Oslo Road (58th <br /> Avenue to 82nd Avenue); and 82nd Avenue (Oslo Road to 26th Street). In addition, Indian River <br /> Boulevard is designated a principal arterial. <br /> Right-of-Way and Corridor Protection <br /> Like many other local governments in Florida, Indian River County maintains minimum right-of- <br /> way standards. The County also engages in right-of-way protection practices, such as maintaining <br /> an inventory of parcels subject to Murphy Act right-of-way reservations and coordinating with <br /> developers and other agencies, through the county's Technical Review Committee (TRC) process, <br /> to acquire right-of-way from new development projects. <br /> The county also maintains a map of future road rights-of-way. That inventory, known as the <br /> Extended Grid Network, is shown on Figure 4.10. Through the Extended Grid Network, future road <br /> rights-of-way are identified on a grid that covers the entire urban service area of the county and <br /> extends to the conservation lands of western Indian River County. The Extended Grid Network <br /> map depicts collector and arterial rights-of-way on existing roadways, as well as logical extensions <br /> of those roadways to undeveloped portions of the county. <br /> With respect to right-of-way acquisition, Indian River County, in 2006, expended approximately <br /> $4,025,999 on road right-of-way acquisition. That right-of way was acquired in anticipation of a <br /> number of roadway widening projects, such as CR 512; Oslo Road; CR 510; 66th Avenue; and 43'•d <br /> Avenue. In 2006, FDOT expended$6,951,851 on roadway right-of-way acquisition in Indian River <br /> County, with approximately $6 million being used to acquire right-of-way on US1 south of 4th <br /> Street. <br /> Community Development Department Indian River County 23 <br /> APPENDIX A—Transportation Amendments <br />