Laserfiche WebLink
The Board approved $617,000, for the above listed renovations to <br />come out of the "one cent sales tax" monies. <br />As an alternative, the Board has requested staff look at using the <br />old Health Clinic for Utility Services rather than the Annex. The <br />following information is furnished for comparison nurnoses! <br />OLD HEALTH CLINIC <br />There are 4,981 net square feet in this building. Utilities <br />presently.'has 4,987 square feet in the Administration Building. <br />The VOA study indicated Utilities would need 7,288 gross square <br />feet, by the year 2000. To meet this need would equate to an <br />additional 2,760 square feet of new construction be added to the <br />building. <br />COURTHOUSE ANNEX <br />This building has 12,150 net square feet that can be used and will <br />be more than enough room to meet the year 2000 projected <br />requirement. <br />The above does not reflect the cost of furnishings. It is <br />estimated that furniture would be about $45,000 for the clinic and <br />about $72,000 for the annex. <br />Impact fees have not been calculated because we are not sure if the <br />City will classify this as a change of use. <br />In response to a proposal, in March of 1994, Gee and Jenson, <br />Engineers -Architects -Planners, Inc. presented a study on indoor air <br />quality for the County Administration Building. In that proposal <br />they submitted a complete retrofit of the HVAC systems in the <br />building. The consultant estimated this work to take thirty-eight <br />(38) weeks to complete at a cost of approximately $1,138,500 not <br />including any cost associated with moving departments and personnel <br />to other locations to accommodate the construction work. <br />ANALY818a <br />The Board approved $1,138,500, out of the "one cent sales tax" <br />monies to perform the above described work. <br />It is staff's feeling that the projects outlined above should be <br />combined :since major construction will be required for both <br />projects and to save on cost associated with contractors, <br />architect/engineering fees and etc. <br />RECONMENDATZONSS <br />It is recommended the Board authorize staff to release an RFP for <br />an architect/engineering firm and to proceed with the steps <br />necessary to hire a qualified company to perform the work required. <br />January 10, 1995 <br />32 �� <br />B®OK 9Gl: <br />e <br />COST COMPARISON <br />Health Clinic <br />Old Annex <br />New Construction <br />$179,920 <br />N/A <br />Renovations <br />215,000 <br />$303,950 <br />Site Work <br />49,000 <br />N/A <br />A/E <br />35,576 <br />28;636 <br />Drive -Up Window <br />15,000 <br />15,000 <br />Elevator <br />N/A <br />39,000 <br />Contingency <br />26.265 <br />17,897 <br />Total <br />$521,545 <br />$404,483 <br />The above does not reflect the cost of furnishings. It is <br />estimated that furniture would be about $45,000 for the clinic and <br />about $72,000 for the annex. <br />Impact fees have not been calculated because we are not sure if the <br />City will classify this as a change of use. <br />In response to a proposal, in March of 1994, Gee and Jenson, <br />Engineers -Architects -Planners, Inc. presented a study on indoor air <br />quality for the County Administration Building. In that proposal <br />they submitted a complete retrofit of the HVAC systems in the <br />building. The consultant estimated this work to take thirty-eight <br />(38) weeks to complete at a cost of approximately $1,138,500 not <br />including any cost associated with moving departments and personnel <br />to other locations to accommodate the construction work. <br />ANALY818a <br />The Board approved $1,138,500, out of the "one cent sales tax" <br />monies to perform the above described work. <br />It is staff's feeling that the projects outlined above should be <br />combined :since major construction will be required for both <br />projects and to save on cost associated with contractors, <br />architect/engineering fees and etc. <br />RECONMENDATZONSS <br />It is recommended the Board authorize staff to release an RFP for <br />an architect/engineering firm and to proceed with the steps <br />necessary to hire a qualified company to perform the work required. <br />January 10, 1995 <br />32 �� <br />B®OK 9Gl: <br />e <br />