My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/6/1995
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1995
>
6/6/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:11 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:37:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/06/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M M <br />Planning staff has coordinated closely with public works, utility <br />services, the attorney's office, emergency services, and <br />environmental health in the review of these agreements. Through <br />this process, the proposed agreements have been structured in a <br />manner acceptable to staff and the developer. The Board of County <br />Commissioners is now to review and consider approval of these <br />agreements. <br />ANALYSIS: <br />•Water and Sanitary Sewer Agreement <br />Utility Services staff have reviewed the water and sanitary sewer <br />agreement and have determined that the agreement is acceptable (see <br />attachment #2). The agreement specifies developer and county <br />responsibilities in regards to: construction and maintenance of <br />various utilities improvements, an initial concurrency <br />determination for water and sewer capacity that has already been <br />reserved for the project, on site water and sewer easements, and <br />treated effluent re -use. <br />•Local Development Agreement <br />The local development agreement addresses many development issues, <br />and specifies the following: <br />1. The limits of county streetlighting requirements. <br />2. The developer's responsibility to construct an 8' wide <br />bikepath along the project's SR 60 frontage, within a 10' wide <br />easement. <br />3. The county's obligation to assist the developer in requesting <br />that FDOT reclassify the segment of SR 60 from 58th Avenue to <br />66th Avenue. <br />4. The developer and county obligations for maintenance and <br />operation of the to -be -installed traffic signals at SR 60/66th <br />Avenue and SR 60/project entrance "F" intersections. <br />5. The developer's means of satisfying a development order (D.O.) <br />condition relating to mass transit (buses) and ridesharing. <br />6. The developer's options and general procedures for platting <br />all or a portion of the project. <br />7. The developer's open spade obligations and distribution of <br />open space throughout the project. <br />8. The developer's landscaping and buffer requirements along SR <br />60, 66th Avenue, and within the project parking areas. <br />9. The developer's obligation to provide interconnections between <br />the project and vacant property north of the project <br />(currently owned by the developer) and commercial property <br />east of the project (along SR 60). <br />10. The developer's ability, subject to agreement by the Indian <br />River Farms Water Control District, to use the east 10' of a <br />30' wide canal maintenance easement that is to be dedicated to <br />the county and the Indian River Farms Water Control District. <br />11. The developer's parking and loading space obligations. <br />12. The developer's obligations for preserving and establishing - <br />conservation easements. <br />13. The developer's limitations on initial land clearing. <br />29. <br />June, 6 1995 BON 9, - �Na. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.