Laserfiche WebLink
`c 7 <br />By specifically stating that the landfill and related activities <br />are uses intended for the PUB land use designation, the proposed <br />amendment adds clarity and certainty to Future Land Use Element <br />Policy 1.27. The proposed changes ensure that the landfill and <br />related activities may continue and expand within the current PUB <br />designated landfill area. <br />Housing Element <br />The proposed amendment is for minor modifications to the county's <br />definition of affordable housing. The only substantive change to <br />the definition would be the deletion of the cost of utilities from <br />the cost of_housing. The adoption of the proposed amendment would <br />result in the county and the state using a similar definition of <br />affordable housing. For that reason, the proposed amendment works <br />to ensure that the county can continue to participate in state <br />funded affordable housing programs. <br />Traffic Circulation Element. <br />- Citrus Highway (County Road 609) <br />After examining the economic, social, environmental, and physical <br />impacts of the proposed Citrus Highway, the CPDR concludes that it <br />is both needed and feasible. That report has determined that 82nd <br />Avenue is the best route for that road in Indian River County. <br />The proposed Citrus Highway will provide several benefits. First, <br />it will serve the citrus industry by providing more efficient <br />movement of citrus from groves to packinghouses and then to <br />consumers. Second, the highway will remove many large, slow moving <br />citrus hauling trucks from U.S. 1. Presently, there are not <br />deficiencies on U.S. 1 in Indian River County. According to <br />Traffic Circulation Element Table 4.7.3, however, the entire length <br />of U.S. 1 in Indian River County and parts of Old Dixie Highway, <br />27th Avenue, and 58th Avenue will be deficient by 2010, if no <br />improvements are made. <br />The CPDR has addressed the environmental impacts of the proposed <br />highway and determined that they would be minor. While the <br />proposed route does not cross any wetlands, there would be a small <br />impact on some native upland plant communities. <br />- Changes to Data and Analysis, Table 4.1, and Policies 2.1, 8.3 <br />and 8.5 <br />Other proposed changes to the Traffic Circulation Element are <br />minor. The proposed amendment will update Traffic Circulation <br />Element Table 4.1 by replacing existing data with the latest and <br />best available data. The proposed changes to Policy 2.1 will <br />incorporate that new data into LOS calculations. Using the latest <br />and best available data ensures accurate modeling for long range <br />transportation planning. <br />Roadway capacities derived from FDOT level of service tables are <br />used in the roadway needs analysis described in the Traffic <br />Circulation Element. In fact, FDOT capacities were used in the <br />recent MPO roadway needs analysis, which the MPO will likely adopt <br />in June 1995. In the next comprehensive plan amendment cycle (July <br />1995), staff will significantly revise Tables 4.7.1, 4.7.2 and <br />4.7.3 and the data and analysis section to reflect the MPO's <br />adopted Long Range Transportation Plan and the use of the revised <br />LOS standards. <br />JUNE 139 1995 17 <br />M M M <br />